Advanced

AJNR - American Journal of Neuroradiology

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Goradia, D. Articles by Blackmore, C.C. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Goradia, D. Articles by Blackmore, C.C.

American Journal of Neuroradiology 28:209-215, February 2007
© 2007 American Society of Neuroradiology

SPINE

Correlation of MR Imaging Findings with Intraoperative Findings after Cervical Spine Trauma

D. Goradia^a,c, K.F. Linnau^a,c, W.A. Cohen^a,c, S. Mirza^b, D.K. Hallam^a,c and C.C. Blackmore^a,c

^a Department of Radiology, Harborview Medical Center, Seattle, Wash
^b Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Harborview Medical Center, Seattle, Wash
^c Department of Radiology, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, Wash

Address correspondence to Dhawal Goradia, MD, Box 357115, Department of Radiology, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA 98195-7115; e-mail: d.goradia{at}comcast.net

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: There are limited data correlating MR imaging and anatomic findings of ligamentous injury in cervical spine trauma. This study compares acute MR imaging with surgical observations of disk/ligamentous injury after blunt cervical trauma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Consecutive patients with acute cervical spine trauma who underwent preoperative MR imaging and surgery from 1998 to 2001 were identified. MR imaging was obtained within 48 hours of injury for most patients. All scans included sagittal T1, T2 fat-saturated, and short tau inversion recovery sequences. At surgery, extent of injury at the operated level was recorded on a standardized form for either anterior or posterior structures or both depending upon the operative approach. MR examinations were separately evaluated by 2 readers blinded to the intraoperative findings. Radiologic and surgical findings were then correlated.

RESULTS: Of 31 patients, an anterior surgical approach was chosen in 17 patients and a posterior approach in 13 patients. In one patient anterior and posterior approaches were utilized. Seventy-one percent of patients had spinal cord injury on MR imaging. MR imaging was highly sensitive for injury to disk (93%), posterior longitudinal ligament (93%), and interspinous soft tissues (100%), but it was less sensitive for injury to the anterior longitudinal ligament (71%) and ligamentum flavum (67%). For most ligamentous structures, there was limited agreement between specific MR imaging findings and injury at surgery.

CONCLUSION: In acute cervical spine trauma, MR imaging has moderate to high sensitivity for injury to specific ligamentous structures but limited agreement between specific MR imaging findings and injury at surgery. MR imaging may overestimate the extent of disruptive injury when compared with intraoperative findings, with potential clinical consequences.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				B. Wee, J. H Reynolds, and A. Bleetman Imaging after trauma to the neck BMJ, January 19, 2008; 336(7636): 154 - 157. [Full Text] [PDF]