American Journal of Neuroradiology 28:293-298, February 2007
© 2007 American Society of Neuroradiology
BRAIN
Comparison of Generalized Autocalibrating Partially Parallel Acquisitions and Modified Sensitivity Encoding for Diffusion Tensor Imaging
a Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
b Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Address correspondence to Christian Beaulieu, PhD, Department of Biomedical Engineering Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, 1098 Research Transition Facility, Edmonton, AB T6G 2V2, Canada; e-mail: christian.beaulieu{at}ualberta.ca
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging (DTI) of the brain is usually acquired with single-shot echo-planar imaging, which is associated with localized signal loss, geometric distortions, and blurring. Parallel imaging can lessen these artifacts by shortening the length of the echo-train acquisition. The self-calibrating parallel acquisition techniques, image domain-based modified sensitivity encoding (mSENSE) and k-space-based generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions (GRAPPA), were evaluated with DTI of the brain in 5 healthy subjects.
METHODS: GRAPPA and mSENSE with higher acceleration factors (R) up to 4 were compared with conventional DTI (with and without phase partial Fourier, another method of reducing the echo-train length) on a 1.5T Sonata scanner (Siemens, Erlangen, Germany). The resulting images and diffusion maps were evaluated qualitatively and quantitatively. Qualitative analysis was performed by 3 reviewers blinded to the technique using image sharpness and the level of artifacts as characteristics for scoring each set of images. Quantitative comparisons encompassed measuring signal-to-noise ratio, Trace/3 apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), and fractional anisotropy (FA) in 6 white-matter (WM) and gray-matter (GM) regions.
RESULTS: Reviewers scored the GRAPPA and mSENSE R = 2 images better than images acquired with conventional techniques. FA contrast was improved at the GM/WM junction in peripheral brain areas. Trace/3 ADC and FA measurements were consistent for all methods. However, R = 3,4 images suffered from reconstruction-related artifacts.
CONCLUSIONS: GRAPPA and mSENSE (R = 2) minimized the susceptibility and off-resonance effects associated with conventional DTI methods, yielding high-quality images and reproducible quantitative diffusion measurements.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C.-H. Toh, M. Castillo, A.M.-C. Wong, K.-C. Wei, H.-F. Wong, S.-H. Ng, and Y.-L. Wan Differentiation Between Classic and Atypical Meningiomas with Use of Diffusion Tensor Imaging AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., October 1, 2008; 29(9): 1630 - 1635. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Mukherjee, S.W. Chung, J.I. Berman, C.P. Hess, and R.G. Henry Diffusion Tensor MR Imaging and Fiber Tractography: Technical Considerations AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., May 1, 2008; 29(5): 843 - 852. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C.-H. Toh, M. Castillo, A.M.-C. Wong, K.-C. Wei, H.-F. Wong, S.-H. Ng, and Y.-L. Wan Primary Cerebral Lymphoma and Glioblastoma Multiforme: Differences in Diffusion Characteristics Evaluated with Diffusion Tensor Imaging AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., March 1, 2008; 29(3): 471 - 475. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
