Advanced

AJNR - American Journal of Neuroradiology

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Mitra, D. Articles by Gholkar, A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Mitra, D. Articles by Gholkar, A.

American Journal of Neuroradiology 28:362-367, February 2007
© 2007 American Society of Neuroradiology

INTERVENTIONAL

Follow-Up of Intracranial Aneurysms Treated with Matrix Detachable Coils: A Single-Center Experience

D. Mitra^a, A. Herwadkar^b, C. Soh^a and A. Gholkar^a

^a Department of Neuroradiology, Newcastle General Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, England
^b Department of Neuroradiology, Hope Hospital, Manchester, England

Address correspondence to Dipayan Mitra, Department of Neuroradiology, Newcastle General Hospital, Westgate Road, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE4 6BE, England; e-mail: dipayan.mitra{at}nuth.nhs.uk

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Matrix coils are polymer-coated bioactive coils used in treatment of intracranial aneurysms. The current study is aimed at evaluating the efficacy and safety of these coils in treatment of ruptured and unruptured aneurysms.

METHODS: Seventy-seven consecutive patients with 84 aneurysms were included in the study. Forty-six aneurysms were treated with Matrix coils alone, and 38 were treated with Matrix coils in combination with other coils/devices. Angiographic follow-up was available in 64 patients with 70 aneurysms. Length of follow-up ranged from 6 to 28 months with mean of 10 months. Both postembolization and follow-up angiograms were graded on a 3-point Raymond scale. Aneurysms were classified as stable, improved, or recanalized based on the follow-up angiograms. Recanalization was considered major if it was saccular and its size would theoretically permit retreatment with coils.

RESULTS: At the end of the initial procedure, 47 (56.0%) aneurysms showed complete occlusion (Raymond 1), 20 (23.8%) showed contrast filling the neck of the aneurysm (Raymond 2), and 16 (19.0%) showed contrast filling the sac of the aneurysm (Raymond 3). Of the 70 aneurysms in which follow-up angiograms were available, 55.7% remained stable in appearance, 20.0% showed improved occlusion, and 24.3% demonstrated recanalization; 8.6% demonstrated major recanalization. There were 2 aneurysm rebleeds (both incompletely packed); one resulted in death.

CONCLUSION: Matrix coils are safe to use and the recanalization rate of aneurysms treated with these coils appears to be at least comparable with historical studies with Guglielmi detachable coils.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				P.M. White and J. Raymond Endovascular Coiling of Cerebral Aneurysms Using "Bioactive" or Coated-Coil Technologies: A Systematic Review of the Literature AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., February 1, 2009; 30(2): 219 - 226. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D.J. Rivet, C.J. Moran, A. Mazumdar, T.K. Pilgram, C.P. Derdeyn, and D.T. Cross Single-Institution Experience with Matrix Coils in the Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms: Comparison with Same-Center Outcomes with the Use of Platinum Coils AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., October 1, 2007; 28(9): 1736 - 1742. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]