AJDRAJNR - American Journal of Neuroradiology

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Raymond, J.
Right arrow Articles by Nguyen, T.N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Raymond, J.
Right arrow Articles by Nguyen, T.N.

Research Perspective

Interventional Neuroradiology: The Role of Experimental Models in Scientific Progress

J. Raymonda, I. Salazkina, G. Gevrya and T.N. Nguyena

a From the Department of Radiology, Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Notre-Dame Hospital, Montreal, Canada

Please address correspondence to Jean Raymond, MD, Department of Radiology, Notre-Dame Hospital, 1560 Sherbrooke St East, Pavilion Mailloux, Suite M8203, Montreal, PQ, Canada H2L 4M1; e-mail: dr_jean_raymond{at}hotmail.com

SUMMARY: The ultimate methodology necessary to adopt a treatment as generally beneficial is the randomized controlled trial, a method designed by and for clinicians to maximize the care of their patients in the presence of uncertainty. Some selection is however necessary to limit trials to more promising and less risky endeavors. Experimental models are the privileged answer to the problem of finding scientific evidence while refraining from harming patients in the course of this pursuit. They allow a step by step assessment, from simple but artificial settings to more complex and realistic animal models. But the use of animal models can only be justified if the community can be convinced that alternatives have been considered but are invalid, when the project is scientifically sound and methodologically irreproachable.

As neurointerventional methods develop and gain wider clinical applications, progress should proceed in an orderly fashion, within limits set by prudence and human values, from the less risky, costly, time consuming methods, to the more definite, pragmatic, labor intensive but inescapable clinical trials. Each step is essential and the sequence cannot be violated without risks of errors that eventually translate into clinical morbidity.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
P.M. White and J. Raymond
Endovascular Coiling of Cerebral Aneurysms Using "Bioactive" or Coated-Coil Technologies: A Systematic Review of the Literature
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., February 1, 2009; 30(2): 219 - 226.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
J. Raymond, T. Darsaut, I. Salazkin, G. Gevry, and F. Bouzeghrane
Mechanisms of Occlusion and Recanalization in Canine Carotid Bifurcation Aneurysms Embolized with Platinum Coils: An Alternative Concept
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., April 1, 2008; 29(4): 745 - 752.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]