Advanced

AJNR - American Journal of Neuroradiology

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Saba, L. Articles by Mallarini, G. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Saba, L. Articles by Mallarini, G.

American Journal of Neuroradiology 28:716-723, April 2007
© 2007 American Society of Neuroradiology

BRAIN

Efficacy and Sensitivity of Axial Scans and Different Reconstruction Methods in the Study of the Ulcerated Carotid Plaque Using Multidetector-Row CT Angiography: Comparison with Surgical Results

L. Saba^a, G. Caddeo^c, R. Sanfilippo^b, R. Montisci^b and G. Mallarini^a,c

^a Department of Imaging Science, Policlinico Universitario, Cagliari, Italy
^b Department of Vascular Surgery, Policlinico Universitario, Cagliari, Italy
^c Institute of Radiology, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy

Address correspondence to Luca Saba, Department of Imaging Science, Policlinico Universitario, s.s. 554 Monserrato (Cagliari) 09045 Italy; e-mail: lucasaba{at}tiscali.it

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Carotid plaque ulceration is an important risk factor for stroke, and its diagnosis may be very important to plan a correct therapeutic approach. We hypothesized that axial scans and various reconstruction methods could have different specificity and sensitivity in the study of plaque ulceration. The object of this study was to evaluate their role and diagnostic efficacy in patients with carotid plaque complicated by ulceration through the comparison with surgical results.

Materials and METHODS: From January 2004 to November 2005, 109 patients who underwent a carotid endarterectomy were analyzed using CT angiography for a total of 218 carotid arteries. We assessed every carotid for the presence of ulcerations. For each patient axial image, maximum intensity projection (MIP), multiplanar reconstruction (MPR), shaded surface display (SSD), and volume rendering (VR) reconstructions were obtained.

RESULTS: Multidetector row CT angiography (MDCT) found 32 ulcerations; surgical confirmation underlined an overall 93.9% sensitivity (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.858–1.021), and a 98.7% specificity (95% CI, 0.961–1.012). Axial scans and volume rendering images demonstrated the highest sensitivity (90.9% and 87.9%, respectively); SSD, on the contrary, showed the lowest sensitivity: 39.4% (95% CI sensitivity, 0.227–0.561).

CONCLUSION: Axial scans plus VR reconstruction techniques offer superior depiction of carotid plaque ulceration compared with MIP, MPR, and SSD.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				F. Runck, R.P. Steiner, W.A. Bautz, and M.M. Lell MR Imaging: Influence of Imaging Technique and Postprocessing on Measurement of Internal Carotid Artery Stenosis AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., October 1, 2008; 29(9): 1736 - 1742. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. Saba and G. Mallarini MDCTA of Carotid Plaque Degree of Stenosis: Evaluation of Interobserver Agreement Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2008; 190(1): W41 - W46. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]