American Journal of Neuroradiology 28:808-815, May 2007
© 2007 American Society of Neuroradiology
INTERVENTIONAL
Basilar Artery Stent Angioplasty for Symptomatic Intracranial Athero-Occlusive Disease: Complications and Late Midterm Clinical Outcomes
a Section of Interventional and Surgical Endovascular Neuroradiology, Departments of Radiology and Neurosurgery and The Neuroscience Institute, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio
b Division of Radiological Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine and MBNA Stroke Center, Atlanta, Ga
c Division of Interventional Neuroradiology, Emory University School of Medicine and MBNA Stroke Center, Atlanta, Ga
d Section of Interventional Neuroradiology, Department of Radiology, The Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn
Address correspondence to Todd Abruzzo, MD, Department of Radiology, c/o Editorial Office, Department of Neurosurgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, ML 0515, 231 Albert Sabin Way, Cincinnati, OH 45267-0515; e-mail: editor{at}mayfieldclinic.com
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: After an initial series of basilar artery stent angioplasty indicated a high technical success rate and minimal morbidity, subsequent reports suggested significant procedural risks. We retrospectively reviewed our experience with basilar artery stent placement to assess complications and clinical outcomes.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten consecutive patients with symptomatic intracranial athero-occlusive disease underwent stent placement of the basilar artery at our institution (19992003). We collected clinical data by chart review and determined outcomes (modified Rankin Scale [mRS]) by telephone interview. Angiographic data were analyzed by 2 blinded investigators. Clinical and angiographic variables were tested for correlation with outcome and complications using the Pearson correlation test.
RESULTS: Of 10 patients (mean follow-up time, 31 months), 4 patients suffered 6 ischemic complications that were immediate in 1, early delayed (<2 weeks) in 4, and late delayed (>2 weeks) in 1. Complications included basilar artery rupture in 1 patient, access site complications in 1 patient, and other non-neurologic complications in 5. Symptomatic restenosis occurred in 1 patient. Outcomes (mRS) were excellent (02) in 5 patients, good (3) in 4, and poor (46) in 1 patient, who died. Ischemic complications were associated with lesion lumen
0.5 mm and lesion angulation >45° (P < .05). Less favorable clinical outcomes were associated with few ischemic complications and the presence of fewer than 2 patent vertebral arteries (P < .05).
CONCLUSIONS: Despite a significant incidence of ischemic and nonischemic complications after basilar artery stent placement, most patients in this small series achieved freedom from vertebrobasilar ischemia and good to excellent clinical outcomes at late midterm follow-up (1246 months). Ischemic complications usually had an early delayed presentation and procedural risks correlated with lesion characteristics.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S I Moskowitz, M E Kelly, N Obuchowski, and D Fiorella Impact of WASID and Wingspan on the frequency of intracranial angioplasty and stenting at a high volume tertiary care hospital JNIS, December 1, 2009; 1(2): 165 - 167. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D Fiorella, T N Turan, C P Derdeyn, and M I Chimowitz Current status of the management of symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic disease: the rationale for a randomized trial of medical therapy and intracranial stenting JNIS, July 3, 2009; (2009) jnis.2009.000125v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Groschel, S. Schnaudigel, S. M. Pilgram, K. Wasser, and A. Kastrup A Systematic Review on Outcome After Stenting for Intracranial Atherosclerosis Stroke, May 1, 2009; 40(5): e340 - e347. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. M. Meyers, H. C. Schumacher, R. T. Higashida, S. L. Barnwell, M. A. Creager, R. Gupta, C. G. McDougall, D. K. Pandey, D. Sacks, and L. R. Wechsler Indications for the Performance of Intracranial Endovascular Neurointerventional Procedures: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention, Stroke Council, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery and Anesthesia, Interdisciplinary Council on Peripheral Vascular Disease, and Interdisciplinary Council on Quality of Care and Outcomes Research Circulation, April 28, 2009; 119(16): 2235 - 2249. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E.I. Levy, L.N. Hopkins, A.S. Turk, D.J. Fiorella, P.A. Rasmussen, T.J. Masaryk, F.C. Albuquerque, C.G. McDougall, G.L. Pride Jr., B.G. Welch, et al. Response to the Commentary "How Do We Spin Wingspan?" AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., September 1, 2008; 29(8): e67 - e68. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Abruzzo, F. Tong, J. E. Dion, M. Workman, and H. J. Cloft Reply: AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., January 1, 2008; 29(1): 6 - 6. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Gupta "Mid-term," "Long-term," and Other Terms: Making Sense of Clinical Follow-up AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., January 1, 2008; 29(1): 6 - 6. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||



