AJDRAJNR - American Journal of Neuroradiology

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nemeth, A.J.
Right arrow Articles by Schaefer, P.W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Nemeth, A.J.
Right arrow Articles by Schaefer, P.W.

BRAIN

Improved Detection of Skull Metastasis with Diffusion-Weighted MR Imaging

A.J. Nemetha, J.W. Hensona,b, M.E. Mullinsc,d, R.G. Gonzaleza and P.W. Schaefera

a Neuroradiology Division, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass
b Pappas Center for Neuro-oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass
c Departments of Radiology, Neurology, and Neurological Surgery, Emory University Hospital, Atlanta, Ga
d School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, Ga

Please address correspondence to Pamela W. Schaefer, MD, Neuroradiology Division, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit St, Gray two Rm B-285, Boston, MA 02114; e-mail: pschaefer{at}partners.org

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Metastasis to the skull is clinically important, but routine MR imaging offers moderate sensitivity for skull-metastasis detection in our experience. We sought to determine if diffusion-weighted MR imaging (DWI) could improve the detection of skull metastasis in patients with primary carcinomas that metastasized to bone compared with conventional MR imaging.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy-five patients from the tumor registry of our institution with extracranial primary malignancy who had brain MR imaging with DWI and radionuclide bone scanning (RNBS, gold standard) within a 6-week interval were evaluated. Thirty-eight patients demonstrated increased radiopharmaceutical uptake on RNBS, consistent with skull metastasis of any size, and the remaining 37 were control subjects. Two readers correlated the DWI and conventional MR imaging with RNBS.

RESULTS: The overall sensitivity of DWI for detection of skull metastases was 68.4%–71.1% ({kappa} = 0.68) versus 42.1%–55.3% ({kappa} = 0.65) for conventional MR imaging. Breast cancer (n = 20) was detected with greatest sensitivity of 86.7%–93.3% ({kappa} = 0.80) for DWI versus 60%–80% ({kappa} = 0.5) for conventional MR imaging. Lung cancer (n = 32) was detected with 63.6%–72.7% sensitivity ({kappa} = 0.56), and prostate cancer (n = 8) with 14.3% sensitivity ({kappa} = 0.5) for DWI versus 27.3%–36.4% ({kappa} = 0.81) and 14.3–42.9% ({kappa} = 0), respectively, for conventional MR imaging.

CONCLUSIONS: DWI is a useful sequence for identifying focal skull metastases for breast and lung malignancies and, compared with conventional MR imaging, provides improved detection of these lesions. DWI is insensitive for detecting skull metastases from prostate carcinoma.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
W. Luboldt, R. Kufer, N. Blumstein, T. L. Toussaint, A. Kluge, M. D. Seemann, and H.-J. Luboldt
Prostate Carcinoma: Diffusion-weighted Imaging as Potential Alternative to Conventional MR and 11C-Choline PET/CT for Detection of Bone Metastases
Radiology, December 1, 2008; 249(3): 1017 - 1025.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
Z. Bozgeyik, S. Ozgocmen, and E. Kocakoc
Role of Diffusion-Weighted MRI in the Detection of Early Active Sacroiliitis
Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2008; 191(4): 980 - 986.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
J.P. Soares-Fernandes, J.M. Valle-Folgueral, N. Morais, M. Ribeiro, and J.A. Moreira-da-Costa
Diffusion-Weighted MR Imaging Findings in an Isolated Abscess of the Clivus
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., January 1, 2008; 29(1): 51 - 52.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]