Advanced

AJNR - American Journal of Neuroradiology

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Steen, R.G. Articles by Lieberman, J.A. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Steen, R.G. Articles by Lieberman, J.A.

American Journal of Neuroradiology 28:1119-1125, June-July 2007
DOI 10.3174/ajnr.A0537
© 2007 American Society of Neuroradiology

BRAIN

Measuring Brain Volume by MR Imaging: Impact of Measurement Precision and Natural Variation on Sample Size Requirements

R.G. Steen^a, R.M. Hamer^a,b and J.A. Lieberman^a,c

^a Departments of Psychiatry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
^b Departments of Biostatistics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
^c Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University, New York

Please address correspondence to R. Grant Steen, PhD, Department of Psychiatry, Campus Box #7160, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7160; e-mail: Grant_Steen{at}med.unc.edu

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To determine the sample size needed to provide adequate statistical power in studies of brain volume by MR imaging, we examined the precision and variability of measurements in healthy controls.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cohort of 52 people (mean age, 25.1 years) was examined at weeks 0 and 12 at 1.5T. We used an axial multisection T1-weighted sequence and a contiguous proton-attenuation/T2-weighted sequence. Data were registered to a probabilistic brain atlas, and an automated atlas-based program was used to segment brain tissue by type and by lobe. We assumed that there were no changes in volume because there were no intervening neurologic events. Sample sizes required to yield 80% statistical power in detecting a significant difference in volume were calculated for various experimental designs, assuming a patient-control volume difference of 5% or 2%.

RESULTS: The precision of most measurements was excellent, but required sample sizes were larger than anticipated. If the goal was to detect a 5% difference in whole brain volume in a 2-sample cross-sectional study, the required sample was 73 patients and 73 controls because brain volume varies between individuals in a way that is not informative about disease effects. For a similar 2-sample longitudinal study, the required sample size was just 5 patients and 5 controls.

CONCLUSIONS: Our results argue strongly for longitudinal studies in preference to cross-sectional studies, especially as research budgets decline. Our findings also suggest that there may be more uncertainty than expected in published MR imaging brain volume studies.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. P. Harms, L. Wang, C. Campanella, K. Aldridge, A. J. Moffitt, J. Kuelper, J. T. Ratnanather, M. I. Miller, D. M. Barch, and J. G. Csernansky Structural abnormalities in gyri of the prefrontal cortex in individuals with schizophrenia and their unaffected siblings The British Journal of Psychiatry, February 1, 2010; 196(2): 150 - 157. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]