AJDRAJNR - American Journal of Neuroradiology

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Razek, A.A.K. A.
Right arrow Articles by Denewar, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Razek, A.A.K. A.
Right arrow Articles by Denewar, A.

HEAD & NECK

Role of Diffusion-Weighted Echo-Planar MR Imaging in Differentiation of Residual or Recurrent Head and Neck Tumors and Posttreatment Changes

A.A.K. Abdel Razeka, A.Y. Kandeela, N. Solimana, H.M. El-shenshawyb, Y. Kamelc, N. Nadae and A. Deneward

a Departments of Diagnostic Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt
b Clinical Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt
c ENT and Head and Neck Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt
d Oncology Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt
e Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt

Address correspondence to Ahmed Abdel Khalek Abdel Razek, Diagnostic Radiology Department, Mansoura Faculty of Medicine, 62 El Nokrasi St, Mansoura, Egypt; e-mail: arazek{at}mans.eun.eg

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The purpose of this work was to evaluate whether diffusion-weighted MR imaging can be used in differentiating residual or recurrent head and neck tumors from postoperative or postradiation changes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study included 32 patients clinically suspected for recurrent head and neck tumor after surgery (n=3), radiation therapy (n=13), or both (n=16). Diffusion-weighted MR imaging was done by using a single-shot spin-echo echo-planar sequence. The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value of the suspected lesion was calculated and correlated with pathologic results.

RESULTS: Adequate diffusion-weighted MR images and ADC maps were obtained in 30 patients (93.8%). The mean ADC value of residual or recurrent lesions (1.17 ± 0.33 x 10–3 mm2/s) was less than that of posttherapeutic changes (2.07 ± 0.25 x 10–3 mm2/s), and the difference was statistically significant (P < .001). When an ADC value of 1.30 x 10–3 mm2/s was used as a threshold value for differentiation, the best results were obtained with an accuracy of 87%, sensitivity of 84%, specificity of 90%, positive predictive value of 94%, and negative predictive value of 76%.

CONCLUSIONS: Diffusion-weighted MR imaging with ADC measurement has promising results for differentiating residual or recurrent head and neck tumors from postoperative or postradiation changes.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. H. Kim, J. M. Lee, S. H. Hong, G. H. Kim, J. Y. Lee, J. K. Han, and B. I. Choi
Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: Added Value of Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging in the Evaluation of Tumor Response to Neoadjuvant Chemo- and Radiation Therapy
Radiology, October 1, 2009; 253(1): 116 - 125.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
S. Kim, L. Loevner, H. Quon, E. Sherman, G. Weinstein, A. Kilger, and H. Poptani
Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Predicting and Detecting Early Response to Chemoradiation Therapy of Squamous Cell Carcinomas of the Head and Neck
Clin. Cancer Res., February 1, 2009; 15(3): 986 - 994.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
A.A.K. A. Razek, A.G. Sadek, O.R. Kombar, T.E. Elmahdy, and N. Nada
Role of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Values in Differentiation Between Malignant and Benign Solitary Thyroid Nodules
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., March 1, 2008; 29(3): 563 - 568.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]