Advanced

AJNR - American Journal of Neuroradiology

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Mull, M. Articles by Thron, A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Mull, M. Articles by Thron, A.

American Journal of Neuroradiology 28:1249-1258, August 2007
DOI 10.3174/ajnr.A0612
© 2007 American Society of Neuroradiology

SPINE

Value and Limitations of Contrast-Enhanced MR Angiography in Spinal Arteriovenous Malformations and Dural Arteriovenous Fistulas

M. Mull^a, R.J. Nijenhuis^b,c, W.H. Backes^b, T. Krings^a, J.T. Wilmink^b and A. Thron^a

^a Department of Neuroradiology, University Hospital, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany
^b Department of Radiology, Maastricht University Hospital, Maastricht, the Netherlands
^c Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Hospital, Maastricht, the Netherlands

Address correspondence to Walter H. Backes, Department of Radiology, Maastricht University Hospital, P. Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX Maastricht, the Netherlands; e-mail: wbac{at}rdia.azm.nl

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The purpose of this work was to study the validity of MR angiography (MRA) for identification of spinal arteriovenous (AV) abnormalities.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-four consecutive patients with suspicion of spinal vascular abnormalities underwent digital subtraction angiography (DSA) after MRA. The level and side of the suspected spinal dural arteriovenous fistula (SDAVF) and the feeding arteries in spinal arteriovenous malformations (SAVMs) were determined from the MRA and compared with DSA.

RESULTS: DSA revealed SDAVF in 20 abnormalities of which 19 were spinal and 1 was tentorial with spinal drainage, as well as SAVM in 11 patients. In 3 patients, MRA and DSA were both normal. For detection of spinal arteriovenous abnormalities, neither false-positive nor false-negative MRA results were obtained. The MRA-derived level of the feeding artery in SDAVF agreed with DSA in 14 of 19 cases. In 5 cases, a mismatch of 1 vertebral level (not side) was noted for the feeding artery. For the tentorial AVF, only the spinal drainage was depicted; the feeding artery was outside the MRA field of view. In intradural SAVM, the main feeding artery was identified by MRA in 10 of 11 patients. MRA could differentiate between glomerular and fistulous SAVM in 4 of 6 cases and between sacral SDAVF and filum terminale SAVM in 2 of 5 cases.

CONCLUSIONS: MRA reliably detects or excludes various types of spinal AV abnormalities and localizes the (predominant) arterial feeder of most spinal AV shunts. Although classification of the subtype of SAVMs remains difficult, with MRA it greatly helps to focus subsequent DSA.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				W.H. Backes and R.J. Nijenhuis Advances in Spinal Cord MR Angiography AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., April 1, 2008; 29(4): 619 - 631. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]