Advanced

AJNR - American Journal of Neuroradiology

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Whitlow, C.T. Articles by Morris, P.P. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Whitlow, C.T. Articles by Morris, P.P.

American Journal of Neuroradiology 28:1266-1270, August 2007
DOI 10.3174/ajnr.A0561
© 2007 American Society of Neuroradiology

SPINE

Sacroplasty versus Vertebroplasty: Comparable Clinical Outcomes for the Treatment of Fracture-Related Pain

C.T. Whitlow^a, B.J. Mussat-Whitlow^b, C.W.T. Mattern^a, M.D. Baker^a and P.P. Morris^a

^a Division of Radiologic Sciences, Department of Radiology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC
^b Division of Planning, Assessment, and Institutional Research, Winston-Salem State University, Winston-Salem, NC

Address correspondence to P. Pearse Morris, MB, BCh, Division of Radiologic Sciences, Department of Radiology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, 2nd Floor, Meads Hall, Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC 27157; e-mail: pmorris{at}wfubmc.edu

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Little is known about the long-term clinical outcomes of sacroplasty, a relatively new minimally invasive percutaneous procedure for the treatment of sacral insufficiency fractures. The first purpose of the present study, therefore, was to investigate the effects of sacroplasty on pain, mobility, and activities of daily living (ADLs). A second purpose was to compare clinical outcomes of sacroplasty with those of vertebroplasty, a similar but more established procedure.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective case series of 12 patients who had a sacroplasty and a control group of 21 patients who had undergone a vertebroplasty was conducted. A 12-item questionnaire and subsequent telephone interview requested each patient to rate the intensity of pain, as well as the ability to ambulate and perform ADLs, before sacroplasty or vertebroplasty, and at the time of the interview.

RESULTS: There was a statistically significant decrease in overall self-reported pain, as well as an increase in self-reported ability to ambulate and perform ADLs after sacroplasty or vertebroplasty. These improvements were equivalent, regardless of which procedure the patient received.

CONCLUSION: The present study suggests that the treatment of sacral insufficiency fractures with sacroplasty produces relatively long-lasting improvements in pain, mobility, and the ability to perform ADLs. These data also suggest that the clinical outcomes of sacroplasty are comparable with those of vertebroplasty, an accepted and more routinely performed procedure.