Advanced

AJNR - American Journal of Neuroradiology

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Moonis, G. Articles by Loevner, L.A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Moonis, G. Articles by Loevner, L.A.

American Journal of Neuroradiology 28:1532-1536, September 2007
DOI 10.3174/ajnr.A0598
© 2007 American Society of Neuroradiology

HEAD & NECK

Imaging Characteristics of Recurrent Pleomorphic Adenoma of the Parotid Gland

G. Moonis^a, P. Patel^a, Y. Koshkareva^c, J. Newman^b and L.A. Loevner^a

^a Department of Radiology, Neuroradiology Division, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa
^b Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa
^c Temple University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pa

Please address correspondence to Gul Moonis, MD, Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, 300 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA 02215; e-mail: gmoonis{at}bidmc.harvard.edu

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Pleomorphic adenoma is the most common parotid neoplasm. It has a relatively high rate of recurrence after surgery. Imaging features of recurrent parotid pleomorphic adenoma have been infrequently reported in the radiology literature. In the present study, we reviewed our institutional experience with imaging of recurrent parotid pleomorphic adenomas.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective imaging and chart review of 24 patients (9 men, 15 women; age, 29–63 years) with recurrent pleomorphic adenoma of the parotid were performed. Images were reviewed as to the margins, site, multiplicity, signal intensity, and enhancement pattern of the recurrent lesions by 2 neuroradiologists.

RESULTS: We found a high incidence of multiple lesions in the operative bed, most of which were extremely bright on T2-weighted images; some of the lesions demonstrated a cystic appearance with peripheral enhancement. We also noted tiny lesions in the subcutaneous fat and in regions distant from the immediate operative bed.

CONCLUSION: Although recurrent disease is usually clinically apparent, sometimes prior surgical history is lacking or recurrence may be detected on routine surveillance imaging after initial surgery. The presence of solitary or multiple subcutaneous T2 hyperintense lesions in the operative bed, subcutaneous fat, and/or spaces adjacent to the parotid in patients with prior parotidectomy for pleomorphic adenoma is consistent with the diagnosis of neoplastic recurrence. The radiologist should maintain a high index of suspicion for recurrent pleomorphic adenoma with this characteristic imaging appearance.