Advanced

AJNR - American Journal of Neuroradiology

Published ahead of print on September 20, 2007
doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A0653

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: ajnr.A0653v1 28/9/1679    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Strub, W.M. Articles by Vagal, A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Strub, W.M. Articles by Vagal, A.

American Journal of Neuroradiology 28:1679-1682, October 2007
© 2007 American Society of Neuroradiology

BRAIN

Overnight Preliminary Head CT Interpretations Provided by Residents: Locations of Misidentified Intracranial Hemorrhage

W.M. Strub^a, J.L. Leach^a, T. Tomsick^a and A. Vagal^a

^a From the Department of Radiology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio

Please address correspondence to William M. Strub, MD, Department of Radiology, University of Cincinnati, 234 Goodman St, ML 0761, Cincinnati, OH 45267; e-mail: williamstrub{at}hotmail.com

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Our aim was to determine the patterns of error of radiology residents in the detection of intracranial hemorrhage on head CT examinations while on call. Follow-up studies were reviewed to determine if there was any adverse effect on patient outcome as a result of these preliminary interpretations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Radiology residents prospectively interpreted 22,590 head CT examinations while on call from January 1, 2002, to July 31, 2006. The following morning, the studies were interpreted by staff neuroradiologists, and discrepancies from the preliminary report were documented. Patients’ charts were reviewed for clinical outcomes and any imaging follow-up.

RESULTS: There were a total of 1037 discrepancies identified, of which 141 were due to intracranial hemorrhage. The most common types of intracranial hemorrhage that were missed were subdural and subarachnoid hemorrhage occurring in 39% and 33% of the cases, respectively. The most common location for missed subdural hemorrhage was either parafalcine or frontal. The most common location of missed subarachnoid hemorrhage was in the interpeduncular cistern. There was 1 case of nontraumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage that was not described in the preliminary report. Fourteen patients were brought back to the emergency department for short-term follow-up imaging after being discharged. We did not observe any adverse clinical outcomes that resulted from a discrepant reading.

CONCLUSION: Discrepancies due to intracranial hemorrhage are usually the result of subdural or subarachnoid hemorrhage. A more complete understanding of the locations of the missed hemorrhage can hopefully help decrease the discrepancy rate to help improve patient care.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. E. Meyer, J. P. Nickerson, H. N. Burbank, G. F. Alsofrom, G. J. Linnell, and C. G. Filippi Discrepancy Rates of On-Call Radiology Residents' Interpretations of CT Angiography Studies of the Neck and Circle of Willis Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2009; 193(2): 527 - 532. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. G. Filippi, B. Schneider, H. N. Burbank, G. F. Alsofrom, G. Linnell, and B. Ratkovits Discrepancy Rates of Radiology Resident Interpretations of On-Call Neuroradiology MR Imaging Studies Radiology, December 1, 2008; 249(3): 972 - 979. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]