Advanced

AJNR - American Journal of Neuroradiology

Published ahead of print on September 24, 2007
doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A0660

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: ajnr.A0660v1 28/9/1819    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Rojas, C.A. Articles by Whitlow, J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Rojas, C.A. Articles by Whitlow, J.

American Journal of Neuroradiology 28:1819-1823, October 2007
© 2007 American Society of Neuroradiology

SPINE

Reassessment of the Craniocervical Junction: Normal Values on CT

C.A. Rojas^a, J.C. Bertozzi^a, C.R. Martinez^a and J. Whitlow^a

^a From the University of South Florida College of Medicine, Tampa, Fla

Please address correspondence to Carlos A. Rojas, MD, 5225 Bayshore Blvd, Tampa, FL 33611; e-mail: crojas{at}health.usf.edu

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: As the standard of care for the evaluation of the cervical spine shifts from plain radiographs to multidetector row CT (MDCT), a re-examination of the normal anatomic relationships of the occipitovertebral articulations is needed. We aimed to define the normal anatomic relationships of craniocervical articulations on MDCT and address any discrepancies with currently accepted ranges of normal on plain radiographs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 200 patients underwent an MDCT scan of the cervical spine with multiplanar reconstructions (MPR). We measured the basion-axial interval (BAI), basion-dens interval (BDI), Powers ratio, atlantodental interval (ADI), and atlanto-occipital interval (AOI) in each patient. After statistical analysis, we compared these values to previously accepted data on plain radiographs.

RESULTS: Ninety-five percent of the population was found to have a BDI less than 8.5 mm compared with 12 mm on data from plain radiographs. The Powers ratio demonstrated no significant difference compared with data obtained by plain radiographs. Ninety-five percent of the population was found to have an ADI less than 2 mm, compared with 3 mm previously accepted. The AOI demonstrated 95% of the population ranged between 0.5 mm and 1.4 mm. The BAI was difficult to reproduce on CT images.

CONCLUSION: Normal values for the craniocervical relationships on MDCT are significantly different from the accepted ranges of normal on plain radiographs. We propose these values as normal for the adult population.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. A. Rojas, A. Hayes, J. C. Bertozzi, C. Guidi, and C. R. Martinez Evaluation of the C1-C2 Articulation on MDCT in Healthy Children and Young Adults Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2009; 193(5): 1388 - 1392. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Bahrami and C. M. Yim Quality Initiatives: Blind Spots at Brain Imaging RadioGraphics, November 1, 2009; 29(7): 1877 - 1896. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. C. Bertozzi, C. A. Rojas, and C. R. Martinez Evaluation of the Pediatric Craniocervical Junction on MDCT Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2009; 192(1): 26 - 31. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]