Advanced

AJNR - American Journal of Neuroradiology

Published ahead of print on November 1, 2007
doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A0813

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: ajnr.A0813v1 29/2/319    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Zivadinov, R. Articles by Dwyer, M.G. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Zivadinov, R. Articles by Dwyer, M.G.

American Journal of Neuroradiology 29:319-325, February 2008
© 2008 American Society of Neuroradiology

SPINE

Comparison of Three Different Methods for Measurement of Cervical Cord Atrophy in Multiple Sclerosis

R. Zivadinov^a,b, A.C. Banas^a, V. Yella^b, N. Abdelrahman^b, B. Weinstock-Guttman^a and M.G. Dwyer^b

^a Jacobs Neurological Institute, Department of Neurology, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY
^b Buffalo Neuroimaging Analysis Center, Department of Neurology, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY

Please address correspondence to Robert Zivadinov, Buffalo Neuroimaging Analysis Center, Jacobs Neurological Institute, 100 High St, Buffalo, NY 14203; e-mail: rzivadinov{at}bnac.net

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Evidence is mounting that spinal cord atrophy significantly correlates with disability in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). The purpose of this work was to validate 3 different measures for the measurement of cervical cord atrophy on high-resolution MR imaging in patients with MS and in normal control subjects (NCs). We also wanted to evaluate the relationship between cervical cord atrophy and clinical disability in the presence of other conventional and nonconventional brain MR imaging metrics by using a unique additive variance regression model.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: We studied 66 MS patients (age, 41.2 ± 12.4 years; disease duration, 11.8 ± 10.7 years; Expanded Disability Status Scale, 3.1 ± 2.1) and 19 NCs (age, 30.4 ± 12.0 years). Disease course was relapsing-remitting (34), secondary-progressive (14), primary-progressive (7), and clinically isolated syndrome (11). The cervical cord absolute volume (CCAV) in cubic millimeters and 2 normalized cervical cord measures were calculated as follows: cervical cord fraction (CCF) = CCAV/thecal sac absolute volume, and cervical cord to intracranial volume (ICV) fraction (CCAV/ICV). Cervical and brain lesion volume measures, brain parenchyma fraction (BPF), and mean diffusivity were also calculated.

RESULTS: CCAV (P < .0001) and CCF (P = .007) showed the largest differences between NCs and MS patients and between different disease subtypes. In regression analysis predicting disability, CCAV was retained first (R² = 0.498; P < .0001) followed by BPF (R² = 0.08; P = .08). Only 8% of the variance in disability was explained by brain MR imaging measures when coadjusted for the amount of cervical cord atrophy.

CONCLUSIONS: 3D CCAV measurement showed the largest differences between NCs and MS patients and between different disease subtypes. Cervical cord atrophy measurement provides valuable additional information related to disability that is not obtainable from brain MR imaging metrics.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K. M. Zackowski, S. A. Smith, D. S. Reich, E. Gordon-Lipkin, B. A. Chodkowski, D. R. Sambandan, M. Shteyman, A. J. Bastian, P. C. van Zijl, and P. A. Calabresi Sensorimotor dysfunction in multiple sclerosis and column-specific magnetization transfer-imaging abnormalities in the spinal cord Brain, May 1, 2009; 132(5): 1200 - 1209. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]