Advanced

AJNR - American Journal of Neuroradiology

Published ahead of print on January 31, 2008
doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A0916

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: ajnr.A0916v1 29/4/655    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Shanmuganathan, K. Articles by Mirvis, S.E. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Shanmuganathan, K. Articles by Mirvis, S.E.

American Journal of Neuroradiology 29:655-659, April 2008
© 2008 American Society of Neuroradiology

SPINE

Diffusion Tensor MR Imaging in Cervical Spine Trauma

K. Shanmuganathan^a, R.P. Gullapalli^a, J. Zhuo^a and S.E. Mirvis^a

^a From the Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, Md

Please address correspondence to K. Shanmuganathan, MD, Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Maryland Medical Center, 22 S. Greene St, Baltimore, MD 21201; e-mail: kshanmuganathan{at}umm.edu

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Our aim was to investigate the extent and severity of changes in spinal cord diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) parameters in patients with cervical cord injury.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: DTI was performed in 20 symptomatic patients (mean, 45.7 ± 17.7 years of age; 2 women, 18 men) with cervical spine trauma and 8 volunteers (mean, 34.2 ± 10.7 years of age; 6 men, 2 women). The whole cord and regional apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), fractional anisotropy (FA), relative anisotropy (RA), and volume ratio (VR) of patients and volunteers were compared. DTI parameters were calculated in 16 patients. MR imaging demonstrated hemorrhagic cord contusions (n = 6), nonhemorrhagic cord contusions (n = 4), and soft-tissue injury (n = 6). Medical records were reviewed for extent of neurologic deficit.

RESULTS: Regional ADC values differed significantly between upper and mid and upper and lower (both, P < .004) cervical cord sections. FA was significantly different between upper and lower sections (P < .03). Whole cord ADC values were significantly lower in patients than in volunteers (P < .0001). Whole spine FA was not significantly decreased in patients (P < .06). ADC and FA values were significantly decreased at injury sites when compared with volunteers (P < .031 and .0001, respectively). The greatest differences in whole cord ADC, FA, RA, and VR were in patients with hemorrhagic cord contusions compared with healthy volunteers (P < .0001, .003, .0005, and .008, respectively).

CONCLUSION: DTI parameters are sensitive markers of cervical cord injury, with ADC showing the greatest sensitivity. Changes in DTI parameters are most marked at injury sites and reflect the severity of cord injury.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				B.M. Ellingson, J.L. Ulmer, S.N. Kurpad, and B.D. Schmit Diffusion Tensor MR Imaging in Chronic Spinal Cord Injury AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., November 1, 2008; 29(10): 1976 - 1982. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]