AJDRAJNR - American Journal of Neuroradiology

Published ahead of print on January 9, 2008
doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A0905

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
ajnr.A0905v1
29/4/668    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bleicher, A.G.
Right arrow Articles by Kanal, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bleicher, A.G.
Right arrow Articles by Kanal, E.

BRAIN

A Serial Dilution Study of Gadolinium-Based MR Imaging Contrast Agents

A.G. Bleichera and E. Kanala

a From the Department of Radiology, Division of Neuroradiology, the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pa

Please address correspondence to Andrew G. Bleicher, MD, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Department of Radiology, Division of Neuroradiology, 200 Lothrop St, Room D-132, Pittsburgh, PA 15213; e-mail: bleicherag{at}upmc.edu

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: With the approval of gadobenate dimeglumine, higher relaxivity MR contrast agents were introduced into the clinical environment, and multiple in vivo studies compared the efficacy and safety with the previously approved agents. An in vitro study was conducted to demonstrate differences between the various agents to confirm published values and for imaging-sequence optimization.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: A contrast phantom was made with serial dilutions of commercially available formulations of 5 US Food and Drug Administration–approved gadolinium-based MR imaging contrast agents in human serum substitute. Dilution factors ranging from 1:8 to 1:4096 were included in the phantom. Spin-echo sequences were performed at 1.5T and 3T with varying TRs and TEs.

RESULTS: At physiologic concentrations and by using short TRs and TEs, gadobenate demonstrated the highest signal intensities, confirming greater R1 relaxivity. At higher concentrations and with longer TR and TE values, the greatest signal intensity loss was appreciated for gadobenate, confirming greater R2 relaxivity.

CONCLUSION: Using rigorous in vitro methodology and serial dilution techniques, this study confirms the reported higher R1 and R2 relaxivities of gadobenate relative to the other agents at 1.5T and 3T.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
H.A. Rowley, G. Scialfa, P.-y. Gao, J.A. Maldjian, D. Hassell, M.J. Kuhn, F.J. Wippold II, M. Gallucci, B.C. Bowen, I.M. Schmalfuss, et al.
Contrast-Enhanced MR Imaging of Brain Lesions: A Large-Scale Intraindividual Crossover Comparison of Gadobenate Dimeglumine versus Gadodiamide
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., October 1, 2008; 29(9): 1684 - 1691.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]