Advanced

AJNR - American Journal of Neuroradiology

Published ahead of print on February 29, 2008
doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A0922

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: ajnr.A0922v1 29/4/781    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Suh, D.C. Articles by Kim, J.S. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Suh, D.C. Articles by Kim, J.S.

American Journal of Neuroradiology 29:781-785, April 2008
© 2008 American Society of Neuroradiology

INTERVENTIONAL

Intracranial Stenting of Severe Symptomatic Intracranial Stenosis: Results of 100 Consecutive Patients

D.C. Suh^a, J.K. Kim^d, J.W. Choi^a, B.S. Choi^a, H.W. Pyun^e, Y.J. Choi^a, M.-H. Kim^a, H.R. Yang^a, H.I. Ha^a, S.J. Kim^a, D.H. Lee^a, C.G. Choi^a, K.D. Hahm^c and J.S. Kim^b

^a Departments of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan, College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
^b Department of Neurology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan, College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
^c Departments of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan, College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
^d Department of Radiology, Seoul Veterans Hospital, Seoul, Korea
^e Department of Radiology, Inha University Hospital, Incheon, Korea

Please address correspondence to Dae Chul Suh, MD, PhD, Department of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan, College of Medicine, 388-one Pungnap-2 Dong, Songpa-Gu, Seoul, 138-736, Korea; e-mail: dcsuh{at}amc.seoul.kr

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: There are a few reports regarding the outcome evaluation of balloon-expandable intracranial stent placement (BEICS). The purpose of our study was to evaluate the outcome and factors related to the adverse events (AEs) of BEICS.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: We evaluated 100 consecutive patients who underwent BEICS. We assessed the procedural success (residual stenosis <50%), AEs (minor strokes, major strokes, and death), clinical outcome, and restenosis (>50%) at 6 months. We also analyzed 18 factors including symptom patterns related to AE rate. Symptom patterns revealed 1) stable patients (n = 73) with improving, stationary, or resolved symptoms; and 2) unstable patients (n = 27) with gradual worsening or fluctuating symptoms (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale [NIHSS] 4) within 2 days before stent placement.

RESULTS: The procedural success rate was 99%. Overall, there were 10 (10%) AEs within the 6 months: 4 (4%) minor strokes, 3 (3%) major strokes, and 3 (3%) deaths including a death from myocardial infarction. AE rate was 4.1% in stable and 25.9% in unstable patients. Restenosis at 6 months revealed 0% (0/59). Good outcome (modified Rankin Scale 2) at 6 months was 97% (71/73) in stable and 67% (18/27) in unstable patients. Stepwise logistic regression model revealed that symptom pattern (unstable versus stable) was the only significant risk factor (OR, 8.167; 95% CI, 1.933–34.500; P = .004).

CONCLUSION: BEICS revealed a low AE and good outcome rate at 6 months, especially in the stable patients. Midterm outcome was also favorable in the unstable patient group.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. K. Wakhloo, M. J. Deleo III, and M. M. Brown Advances in Interventional Neuroradiology Stroke, May 1, 2009; 40(5): e305 - e312. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Groschel, S. Schnaudigel, S. M. Pilgram, K. Wasser, and A. Kastrup A Systematic Review on Outcome After Stenting for Intracranial Atherosclerosis Stroke, May 1, 2009; 40(5): e340 - e347. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]