Advanced

AJNR - American Journal of Neuroradiology

Published ahead of print on February 13, 2008
doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A1017

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: ajnr.A1017v1 29/5/895    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Hoxworth, J.M. Articles by Dillon, W.P. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Hoxworth, J.M. Articles by Dillon, W.P.

American Journal of Neuroradiology 29:895-897, May 2008
© 2008 American Society of Neuroradiology

HEAD & NECK

Focal Opacification of the Olfactory Recess on Sinus CT: Just an Incidental Finding?

J.M. Hoxworth^a, C.M. Glastonbury^b, N.J. Fischbein^c and W.P. Dillon^b

^a Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale/Phoenix, Az
^b Department of Radiology, University of California, San Francisco Medical Center, San Francisco, Calif
^c Department of Radiology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, Calif

Please address correspondence to Dr. Joseph M. Hoxworth, Mayo Clinic, Neuroradiology Section, Department of Radiology, SC MC LL RAD, 13400 East Shea Blvd, Scottsdale, AZ 85259-5404; e-mail: hoxworth.joseph{at}mayo.edu

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The CT appearance of the anterior skull base has been investigated but with limited attention directed to the olfactory recess. As defined by opacity abutting the undersurface of the cribriform plate, the prevalence of olfactory recess opacity (ORO) on sinus CT was examined to clarify whether this should raise suspicion for an unsuspected pathologic process.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Outpatient sinus CTs were evaluated for ORO in 500 consecutive patients (mean age, 46.9 years; 52.6% women). On a per-side basis (n = 1000), the presence of surgical changes, inflammatory sinus disease, and concha bullosa was determined by 2 neuroradiologists. Logistic regression was used to examine the association of ORO with these variables.

RESULTS: ORO was identified in 59 (11.8%) patients, bilateral in 27 (5.4%), and unilateral in 32 (6.4%). There were 343 of 1000 ethmoid sides that were diseased, and 66 (27.2%) showed ipsilateral ORO. In contrast, only 20 (3.0%) of 657 clear ethmoid sides showed ORO (P < .0001). ORO was significantly (P = .013) more common with previous surgery (18/75; 24.0%) than without (68/925; 7.4%). Ipsilateral concha bullosa was not associated with ORO. Of 32 patients with unilateral ORO, 5 (15.6%) had no ethmoid opacification or previous surgery, and 1 of these patients had an encephalocele causing the ORO. Finally, unilateral ORO was present in only 1 of 122 patients with completely clear sinuses (the encephalocele that was just mentioned).

CONCLUSION: ORO is distinctly uncommon without sinonasal inflammation or previous surgery. Isolated unilateral ORO raises suspicion for an underlying neoplasm or cephalocele and warrants further evaluation.