AJDRAJNR - American Journal of Neuroradiology

Published ahead of print on March 27, 2008
doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A1030

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
ajnr.A1030v1
29/7/1228    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Deibler, A.R.
Right arrow Articles by Maldjian, J.A.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Deibler, A.R.
Right arrow Articles by Maldjian, J.A.

Review Article

Arterial Spin-Labeling in Routine Clinical Practice, Part 1: Technique and Artifacts

A.R. Deiblera, J.M. Pollocka, R.A. Kraftb, H. Tanb, J.H. Burdettea and J.A. Maldjiana

a Department of Radiology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC
b Department of Biomedical Engineering, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC

Please address correspondence to Joseph Maldjian, MD, Wake Forest University, Department of Radiology, Medical Center Blvd, Winston-Salem, NC 27157; e-mail: maldjian{at}wfubmc.edu

SUMMARY: The routine use of arterial spin-labeling (ASL) in a clinical population has led to the depiction of diverse brain pathologic features. Unique challenges in the acquisition, postprocessing, and analysis of cerebral blood flow (CBF) maps are encountered in such a population, and high-quality ASL CBF maps can be generated consistently with attention to quality control and with the use of a dedicated postprocessing pipeline. Familiarity with commonly encountered artifacts can help avoid pitfalls in the interpretation of CBF maps. The purpose of this review was to describe our experience with a heterogeneous collection of ASL perfusion cases with an emphasis on methodology and common artifacts encountered with the technique. In a period of 1 year, more than 3000 pulsed ASL cases were performed as a component of routine clinical brain MR evaluation at both 1.5 and 3T. These ASL studies were analyzed with respect to overall image quality and patterns of perfusion on final gray-scale DICOM images and color Joint Photographic Experts Group (JPEG) CBF maps, and common artifacts and their impact on final image quality were categorized.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
A.R. Deibler, J.M. Pollock, R.A. Kraft, H. Tan, J.H. Burdette, and J.A. Maldjian
Arterial Spin-Labeling in Routine Clinical Practice, Part 3: Hyperperfusion Patterns
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., September 1, 2008; 29(8): 1428 - 1435.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
A.R. Deibler, J.M. Pollock, R.A. Kraft, H. Tan, J.H. Burdette, and J.A. Maldjian
Arterial Spin-Labeling in Routine Clinical Practice, Part 2: Hypoperfusion Patterns
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., August 1, 2008; 29(7): 1235 - 1241.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]