Advanced

AJNR - American Journal of Neuroradiology

Published ahead of print on April 16, 2008
doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A1092

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Supplemental Online Table All Versions of this Article: ajnr.A1092v1 29/7/1349    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Arya, S. Articles by Dcruz, A.K. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Arya, S. Articles by Dcruz, A.K.

American Journal of Neuroradiology 29:1349-1354, August 2008
© 2008 American Society of Neuroradiology

HEAD & NECK

Carotid Body Tumors: Objective Criteria to Predict the Shamblin Group on MR Imaging

S. Arya^a, V. Rao^b, S. Juvekar^a and A.K. Dcruz^b

^a Departments of Radiology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India
^b Head and Neck Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India

Please address correspondence to Supreeta Arya, Department of Radiology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Ernest Borges Rd, Parel, Mumbai 400 012, India; e-mail: supreeta.arya{at}gmail.com

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: MR imaging is an established method for diagnosis and surgical planning of carotid body tumors (CBTs). However no studies have elaborated preoperative objective criteria to predict the Shamblin (surgical) classification of CBTs, an important predictor of vascular morbidity. The purpose of this study was to establish criteria to accurately predict the Shamblin group on preoperative MR imaging for a uniform reporting system.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: MR images of 9 CBTs in 8 consecutive patients who underwent surgery between 2004 and 2007 were reviewed at a tertiary cancer hospital. The surgical records were blinded to the radiologists. A radiologic classification into 3 types (I, II, and III) based on the maximum degree of circumferential contact of the tumor with the internal carotid artery (ICA) was attempted and correlated with the Shamblin group in surgical records.

RESULTS: There were 5 type III, 3 type II, and 1 type I tumors. The type I tumor had an ICA maximum circumference of contact less than or equal to 180°, type II tumors had more than 180° and less than 270°, and type III tumors had a maximum circumference of contact of 270° of more. MR imaging accurately predicted the Shamblin group in 8 (100%) of 8 operated tumors. Tumor size and Shamblin group did not have a uniformly predictable relation.

CONCLUSIONS: Shamblin group can be predicted preoperatively on MR imaging, and the maximum degree of circumferential contact of the CBT with the ICA on axial images is the criterion to predict the Shamblin group.