doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A1166
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
American Journal of Neuroradiology 29:1530-1536, September 2008
© 2008 American Society of Neuroradiology
BRAIN
Follow-Up of Coiled Cerebral Aneurysms at 3T: Comparison of 3D Time-of-Flight MR Angiography and Contrast-Enhanced MR Angiography
a Department of Neuroradiology, Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
b Worldwide Medical and Regulatory Affairs, Bracco Imaging SpA, Milan, Italy
Please address correspondence to Nicoletta Anzalone, MD, Department of Neuroradiology, Scientific Institute, Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, 20132, Italy; e-mail: anzalone.nicoletta{at}hsr.it
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Our aim was to compare contrast-enhanced MR angiography (CE-MRA) and 3D time-of-flight (TOF) MRA at 3T for follow-up of coiled cerebral aneurysms.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-two patients treated with Guglielmi detachable coils for 54 cerebral aneurysms were evaluated at 3T MRA. 3D TOF MRA (TR/TE = 23/3.5; SENSE factor = 2.5) and CE-MRA by using a 3D ultrafast gradient-echo sequence (TR/TE = 5.9/1.8; SENSE factor = 3) enhanced with 0.1-mmol/kg gadobenate dimeglumine were performed in the same session. Source images, 3D maximum intensity projection, 3D shaded surface display, and/or 3D volume-rendered reconstructions were evaluated in terms of aneurysm occlusion/patency and artifact presence.
RESULTS: In terms of clinical classification, the 2 MRA sequences were equivalent for 53 of the 54 treated aneurysms: 21 were considered fully occluded, whereas 16 were considered to have a residual neck and 16 were considered residually patent at follow-up MRA. The remaining aneurysm appeared fully occluded at TOF MRA but had a residual patent neck at CE-MRA. Visualization of residual aneurysm patency was significantly (P = .001) better with CE-MRA compared with TOF MRA for 10 (31.3%) of the 32 treated aneurysms considered residually patent with both sequences. Coil artifacts were present in 5 cases at TOF MRA but in none at CE-MRA. No relationship was apparent between the visualization of patency and either the size of the aneurysm or the interval between embolization and follow-up.
CONCLUSION: At follow-up MRA at 3T, unenhanced TOF and CE-MRA sequences are similarly effective at classifying coiled aneurysms as occluded or residually patent. However, CE-MRA is superior to TOF MRA for visualization of residual patency and is associated with fewer artifacts.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M.E.S. Sprengers, J.D. Schaafsma, W.J. van Rooij, R. van den Berg, G.J.E. Rinkel, E.M. Akkerman, S.P. Ferns, and C.B.L.M. Majoie Evaluation of the Occlusion Status of Coiled Intracranial Aneurysms with MR Angiography at 3T: Is Contrast Enhancement Necessary? AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., October 1, 2009; 30(9): 1665 - 1671. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Kau, J. Gasser, S. Celedin, E. Rabitsch, W. Eicher, E. Uhl, and K.A. Hausegger MR Angiographic Follow-Up of Intracranial Aneurysms Treated with Detachable Coils: Evaluation of a Blood-Pool Contrast Medium AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., September 1, 2009; 30(8): 1524 - 1530. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Anzalone MR Angiography Follow-Up of Aneurysms Treated with Coils: Is There a Need for the Use of Gadolinium? AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., September 1, 2009; 30(8): 1531 - 1531. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
