American Journal of Neuroradiology 29:1537-1543, September 2008
© 2008 American Society of Neuroradiology
BRAIN
Caudate Nucleus Volumes in Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration: Differential Atrophy in Subtypes
a Academic Unit of Psychological Medicine, Research Centre for the Neurosciences of Ageing, Australian National University Medical School, The Canberra Hospital, Canberra, Australia
b Department of Neurobiology, Karolinska Institute, Caring Sciences and Society, Division of Clinical Geriatrics, Huddinge, Stockholm, Sweden
c Hospital Physics and Radiology, Karolinska University Hospital, Huddinge, Stockholm, Sweden
d Dr. Zandbelt is now with the Department of Psychiatry, Rudolf Magnus Institute of Neuroscience, University Medical Center Utrecht, the Netherlands
Please address correspondence to Jeffrey Looi, MD, Research Centre for the Neurosciences of Ageing, Academic Unit of Psychological Medicine, Australian National University Medical School, Bldg 4, Level 2, The Canberra Hospital, PO Box 11, Woden ACT 2605, Australia; e-mail: Jeffrey.looi{at}anu.edu.au
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Frontostriatal circuits involving the caudate nucleus have been implicated in frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD). We assessed caudate nucleus volumetrics in FTLD and subtypes: frontotemporal dementia (FTD, n = 12), semantic dementia (SD, n = 13), and progressive nonfluent aphasia (PNFA, n = 9) in comparison with healthy controls (n = 27) and subjects with Alzheimer disease (AD, n = 19).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Diagnoses were based on accepted clinical criteria. Manual volume measurement of the head and body of the caudate, excluding the tail, was conducted on T1-weighted brain MR imaging scans, using a published protocol, by a single analyst blinded to the diagnosis.
RESULTS: Paired t tests (P < .05) showed that the right caudate nucleus volume was significantly larger than the left in controls and PNFA. No hemispheric asymmetry was found in AD, FTD, and SD. Across the groups, there was a positive partial correlation between the left caudate nucleus volume and Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) scores (r = 0.393, n = 76, P = .001) with higher left caudate volumes associated with higher MMSE scores. Multivariate analysis of covariance was used to assess the statistical significance between the subject groups (AD, FTD, SD, PNFA, and controls) as independent variables and raw right/left caudate volumes at the within-subject level (covariates: age and intracranial volume; P < .05). Control volume was largest, followed by AD (93% of control volume), SD (92%), PNFA (79%), and FTD (75%).
CONCLUSIONS: Volume of the head and body of the caudate nucleus differs in subtypes of FTLD, due to differential frontostriatal dysfunction in subtypes being reflected in structural change in the caudate, and is correlated with cognition.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J.C.L. Looi, L. Svensson, O. Lindberg, B.B. Zandbelt, P. Ostberg, E. Orndahl, and L.-O. Wahlund Putaminal Volume in Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration and Alzheimer Disease: Differential Volumes in Dementia Subtypes and Controls AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., September 1, 2009; 30(8): 1552 - 1560. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
