AJDRAJNR - American Journal of Neuroradiology

This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Anand, A. K.
Right arrow Articles by Lee, B. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Anand, A. K.
Right arrow Articles by Lee, B. C.

American Journal of Neuroradiology, Vol 3, Issue 5 567-571, Copyright © 1982 by American Society of Neuroradiology


ARTICLES

Plain and metrizamide CT of lumbar disk disease: comparison with myelography

AK Anand and BC Lee

Computed tomography with and without administration of intrathecal contrast material was evaluated in 100 patients with suspected lumbar disk disease. Metrizamide computed tomography was performed in 75 patients and plain computed tomography was performed in 25. Metrizamide computed tomography was more accurate than plain computed tomography. It also disclosed many lesions not shown by metrizamide myelography at the lumbosacral level. Very few lesions were revealed by myelography that were not seen by metrizamide computed tomography. The small amount of intrathecal metrizamide needed for scanning has practically no side effects. Experience in 12 patients indicates that the procedure may be performed safely on an outpatient basis. This study suggests that computed tomography should be given serious consideration as the primary definitive radiographic examination of suspected lumbar disk disease.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
N. E. Leeds and S. A. Kieffer
Evolution of Diagnostic Neuroradiology from 1904 to 1999
Radiology, November 1, 2000; 217(2): 309 - 318.
[Abstract] [Full Text]