Advanced

AJNR - American Journal of Neuroradiology

Published ahead of print on October 8, 2008
doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A1303

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Supplemental Online Tables All Versions of this Article: ajnr.A1303v1 30/1/203    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Wang, W. Articles by Desmond, P.M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Wang, W. Articles by Desmond, P.M.

American Journal of Neuroradiology 30:203-208, January 2009
© 2009 American Society of Neuroradiology

BRAIN

Diffusion Tensor Imaging in Glioblastoma Multiforme and Brain Metastases: The Role of p, q, L, and Fractional Anisotropy

W. Wang^a, C.E. Steward^a and P.M. Desmond^a

^a From the Department of Radiology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia

Please address correspondence to Christopher E. Steward, PhD, Department of Radiology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, 3050, Australia; e-mail: Christopher.steward{at}mh.org.au

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Microinvasive tumor cells, which are not detected on conventional imaging, contribute to poor prognoses for patients diagnosed with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM, WHO grade IV). Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) shows promise in being able to detect this infiltration. This study aims to detect a difference in diffusion properties between GBM (infiltrative) and brain metastases (noninfiltrative).

MATERIALS AND METHODS: For 49 tumors (30 GBM, 19 metastases), DTI measures (p, q, L, and fractional anisotropy [FA]) were calculated for regions of gross tumor (excluding hemorrhagic and necrotic core), peritumoral edema, peritumoral margin (edema most adjacent to tumor), adjacent normal-appearing white matter (NAWM), and contralateral white matter. Parametric and nonparametric statistical tests were used to determine significance, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses were performed.

RESULTS: Mean values of p, L, and FA from regions of signal-intensity abnormality differed from those of normal brain in both tumors. The mean q value did not differ significantly compared with that in normal brain in any region in metastases or in adjacent NAWM of GBM. For GBM compared with metastases, q and FA were significantly lower in gross tumor (P < .001) and q was significantly lower in peritumoral margin (P < .001), which may be due to tumor infiltration. Significant overlap was present, which was reflected in the ROC curve analyses (area under the curve values from 0.732 to 0.804).

CONCLUSIONS: DTI may be used to help differentiate between GBM and brain metastases. The results also suggest that DTI has the potential to assist in detecting infiltrative tumor cells in surrounding brain.