Advanced

AJNR - American Journal of Neuroradiology

Published ahead of print on October 2, 2008
doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A1281

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: ajnr.A1281v1 30/1/34    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Linn, J. Articles by Yousry, I. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Linn, J. Articles by Yousry, I.

American Journal of Neuroradiology 30:34-41, January 2009
© 2009 American Society of Neuroradiology

HEAD & NECK

The Jugular Foramen: Imaging Strategy and Detailed Anatomy at 3T

J. Linn^a, F. Peters^a, B. Moriggl^b, T.P. Naidich^c, H. Brückmann^a and I. Yousry^a

^a Department of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Munich, Munich, Germany
^b Institute of Anatomy, Histology, and Embryology, Medical University Innsbruck, Austria
^c Department of Radiology, Section of Neuroradiology, Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, NY

Please address correspondence to Jennifer Linn, MD, Department of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Munich, Marchioninistr 15, D-81377 Munich, Germany; e-mail: linn{at}nrad.de

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess how well the anatomy of the jugular foramen (JF) could be displayed by 3T MR imaging by using a 3D contrast-enhanced fast imaging employing steady-state acquisition sequence (CE-FIESTA) and a 3D contrast-enhanced MR angiographic sequence (CE-MRA).

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-five patients free of skull base lesions were imaged on a 3T MR imaging scanner using CE-FIESTA and CE-MRA. Two readers analyzed the images in collaboration, with the following objectives: 1) to score the success with which these sequences depicted the glossopharyngeal (CNIX) and vagus (CNX) nerves, their ganglia, and the spinal root of the accessory nerve (spCNXI) within the JF, and 2) to determine the value of anatomic landmarks for the in vivo identification of these structures.

RESULTS: CE-FIESTA and CE-MRA displayed CNIX in 90% and 100% of cases, respectively, CNX in 94% and 100%, and spCNXI in 51% and 0% of cases. The superior ganglion of CNIX was discernible in 89.8% and 87.8%; the inferior ganglion of CNIX, in 73% and 100%; and the superior ganglion of CNX, in 98% and 100% of cases. Landmarks useful for identifying these structures were the inferior petrosal sinus and the external opening of the cochlear aqueduct.

CONCLUSIONS: This study protocol is excellent for displaying the complex anatomy of the JF and related structures. It is expected to aid in detecting small pathologies affecting the JF and in planning the best surgical approach to lesions affecting the JF.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				W.-J. Moon, H.G. Roh, and E.C. Chung Detailed MR Imaging Anatomy of the Cisternal Segments of the Glossopharyngeal, Vagus, and Spinal Accessory Nerves in the Posterior Fossa: The Use of 3D Balanced Fast-Field Echo MR Imaging AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., June 1, 2009; 30(6): 1116 - 1120. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]