AJDRAJNR - American Journal of Neuroradiology

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bisdas, S.
Right arrow Articles by Mack, M.G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bisdas, S.
Right arrow Articles by Mack, M.G.

HEAD & NECK

Response and Progression-Free Survival in Oropharynx Squamous Cell Carcinoma Assessed by Pretreatment Perfusion CT: Comparison with Tumor Volume Measurements

S. Bisdasa,b, Z. Rumboldtb, J. Wagenblastc, M. Baghic, T.S. Kohd, M. Hambekc, T.J. Vogla and M.G. Macka

a Department of Radiology, Johann Wolfgang Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany
b Department of Radiology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC
c Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Johann Wolfgang Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany
d School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore

Please address correspondence to Sotirios Bisdas, MD, Department of Neuroradiology, Eberhard Karls University, Hoppe-Seyler-Str. 3, 72076 Tübingen, Germany; e-mail: Sotirios.Bisdas{at}med.uni-tuebingen.de

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Perfusion CT (PCT) provides a rapid, reliable, and non-invasive technique for assessing tumor vascularity. The purpose of this study was to assess whether pretreatment dynamic perfusion CT (PCT) may predict response to induction chemotherapy and midterm progression-free survival (PFS) in advanced oropharynx squamous cell carcinoma (SCCA) and to compare the results with those derived by tumor volume measurements.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Nineteen patients underwent routine contrast-enhanced CT (CECT), pretreatment PCT, and conventional endoscopy. Tumor response was determined according to radiologic (RECIST) criteria. The PCT parameters, tumor volume, radiologic response, and PFS were analyzed with use of Cox-proportional hazards model, receiver operating characteristic (ROC), and Kaplan-Meier analysis.

RESULTS: The baseline blood flow (BF), blood volume (BV), and permeability surface area product (PS) were significantly higher, whereas mean transit time (MTT) was significantly lower in the responders than in the nonresponders (P ≤ .002). BV showed 100% sensitivity, MTT and PS had the highest specificity (100%), and BF showed 84.2% sensitivity and 66.7% specificity for prediction of tumor response after induction chemotherapy. The pretreatment tumor volume correlated with PFS in the pooled patients group (r = 0.4; P < .0001), whereas postinduction tumor volume correlated significantly with PFS in the responders and nonresponders (r = 0.22–0.64; P ≤ .006). Pretreatment tumor volume (P = .0001) and BF (P = .001) were significant predictors for PFS.

CONCLUSIONS: Pretreatment PCT parameters may predict response after induction chemotherapy. Tumor volume and BF values may predict PFS in patients with advanced oropharyngeal SCCA.