Advanced

AJNR - American Journal of Neuroradiology

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Goode, S.D. Articles by Auer, D.P. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Goode, S.D. Articles by Auer, D.P.

American Journal of Neuroradiology 30:972-977, May 2009
© 2009 American Society of Neuroradiology

FUNCTIONAL

Precision of Cerebrovascular Reactivity Assessment with Use of Different Quantification Methods for Hypercapnia Functional MR Imaging

S.D. Goode^a,b, S. Krishan^a, C. Alexakis^a, R. Mahajan^c and D.P. Auer^a

^a Department of Academic Radiology, Queens Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK
^b Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Queens Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK
^c Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Queens Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK

Please address correspondence to Dr. S.D. Goode, Department of Academic Radiology, B Floor, West Block, Queens Medical Centre, Derby Rd, Nottingham NG7 2UH, United Kingdom; e-mail: msxsg{at}nottingham.ac.uk

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Tools for noninvasive mapping of hemodynamic function including cerebrovascular reactivity are emerging and may become clinically useful to predict tissue at hemodynamic risk. One such technique assesses blood oxygen level–dependent (BOLD) MR imaging contrast in response to hypercapnia, but the reliability of its quantification is uncertain. The aim of this study was to prospectively investigate the intersubject and interhemispheric variability and short-term reproducibility of hypercapnia functional MR imaging (fMRI) in healthy volunteers and to assess the effects of different methods of quantification and normalization.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixteen healthy volunteers, (7 women and 9 men) underwent hypercapnia fMRI with a clinical 1.5T scanner; 8 underwent scanning twice. We determined BOLD amplitude changes using a visually defined block design or automated regression to end-tidal (_ET) carbon dioxide (CO₂). Absolute percent signal intensity changes (PSC) were extracted for whole-brain, gray matter, and middle cerebral artery territory, and also normalized to _ETCO₂ change. Intersubject and intrasubject (between hemispheres and sessions) coefficients of variation (COV) were derived. We assessed the effects of different quantification methods on reproducibility indices using the t test and U tests.

RESULTS: The mean change in _ETCO₂ was 7.8 ± 3.3 mm Hg. Averaged BOLD increases varied from 2.54% to 2.92%. Short-term reproducibility was good for absolute PSC (4.8% to 10%) but poor for normalized PSC (range, 24% to 27% COV). Intersubject reproducibility varied between 11% and 23% for absolute PSC and, again, was poorer for normalized data (32% to 39%). Interhemispheric reproducibility of absolute PSC was excellent ranging between 1.24 and 2.16% COV.

CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, quantification of cerebrovascular reactivity with use of hypercapnia fMRI was found to have good between-session and very good interhemispheric reproducibility. The technique holds promise as a diagnostic tool, especially for sensitive detection of unilateral disease.