Advanced

AJNR - American Journal of Neuroradiology

Published ahead of print on April 8, 2009
doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A1547

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) An erratum has been published All Versions of this Article: ajnr.A1547v1 30/6/1206    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Kranz, P.G. Articles by Eastwood, J.D. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Kranz, P.G. Articles by Eastwood, J.D.

American Journal of Neuroradiology 30:1206-1212, June-July 2009
© 2009 American Society of Neuroradiology

BRAIN

Does Diffusion-Weighted Imaging Represent the Ischemic Core? An Evidence-Based Systematic Review

P.G. Kranz^a and J.D. Eastwood^a

^a From the Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC

Please address correspondence to Peter G. Kranz, MD, Department of Radiology, Box 3808, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710; e-mail: peter.kranz{at}duke.edu

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) hyperintensity is hypothesized to represent irreversibly infracted tissue (ischemic core) in the setting of acute stroke. Measurement of the ischemic core has implications for both prognosis and therapy. We wished to assess the level of evidence in the literature supporting this hypothesis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a systematic review of the literature relating to tissue outcomes of DWI hyperintense stroke lesions in humans. The methodologic rigor of studies was evaluated by using criteria set out by the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine. Data from individual studies were also analyzed to determine the prevalence of patients demonstrating lesion progression, no change, or lesion regression compared with follow-up imaging.

RESULTS: Limited numbers of highly methodologically rigorous studies (Oxford levels 1 and 2) were available. There was great variability in observed rates of DWI lesion reversal (0%–83%), with a surprisingly high mean rate of DWI lesion reversal (24% of pooled patients). Many studies did not include sufficient data to determine the precise prevalence of DWI lesion growth or reversal.

CONCLUSIONS: The available tissue-outcome evidence supporting the hypothesis that DWI is a surrogate marker for ischemic core in humans is troublingly inconsistent and merits an overall grade D based on the criteria set out by the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine.