Advanced

AJNR - American Journal of Neuroradiology

Published ahead of print on April 2, 2009
doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A1544

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: ajnr.A1544v1 30/6/1240    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Cerasa, A. Articles by Quattrone, A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Cerasa, A. Articles by Quattrone, A.

American Journal of Neuroradiology 30:1240-1243, June-July 2009
© 2009 American Society of Neuroradiology

BRAIN

Cerebellar Atrophy in Essential Tremor Using an Automated Segmentation Method

A. Cerasa^a, D. Messina^a,b, G. Nicoletti^a,b, F. Novellino^b, P. Lanza^a, F. Condino^a, G. Arabia^a, M. Salsone^b and A. Quattrone^a,b

^a Institute of Neurological Sciences, National Research Council, Piano Lago di Mangone, Cosenza, Italy
^b Institute of Neurology, University "Magna Graecia," Catanzaro, Italy

Please address correspondence to Aldo Quattrone, MD, Institute of Neurology, Department of Medical Sciences, University Magna Graecia, Catanzaro, Italy; e-mail: a.quattrone{at}isn.cnr.it

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Essential tremor (ET) is a slowly progressive disorder characterized by postural and kinetic tremors most commonly affecting the forearms and hands. Several lines of evidence from physiologic and neuroimaging studies point toward a major role of the cerebellum in this disease. Recently, voxel-based morphometry (VBM) has been proposed to quantify cerebellar atrophy in ET. However, VBM was not originally designed to study subcortical structures, and the complicated anatomy of the cerebellum may hamper the automatic processing of VBM. The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy and utility of using automated subcortical segmentation to identify atrophy of the cerebellum and other subcortical structures in patients with ET.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: We used a recently developed automated volumetric method (FreeSurfer) to quantify subcortical atrophy in ET by comparing results obtained with this method with those provided by previous evidence. The study included T1-weighted MR images of 46 patients with ET grouped into those having arm ET (n = 27, a-ET) or head ET (n = 19, h-ET) and 28 healthy controls.

RESULTS: Results revealed the expected reduction of cerebellar volume in patients with h-ET with respect to healthy controls after controlling for intracranial volume. No significant difference was detected in any other subcortical area.

CONCLUSIONS: Volumetric data obtained with automated segmentation of subcortical and cerebellar structures approximate data from a previous study based on VBM. The current findings extend the literature by providing initial validation for using fully automated segmentation to derive cerebellar volumetric information from patients with ET.