AJDRAJNR - American Journal of Neuroradiology

Published ahead of print on May 20, 2009
doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A1616

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
ajnr.A1616v1
30/8/1580    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Scollato, A.
Right arrow Articles by Di Lorenzo, N.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Scollato, A.
Right arrow Articles by Di Lorenzo, N.

BRAIN

Changes in Aqueductal CSF Stroke Volume in Shunted Patients with Idiopathic Normal-Pressure Hydrocephalus

A. Scollatoa, P. Gallinac, B. Gautamb, G. Pellicanòa, C. Cavallinid, R. Tenenbauma and N. Di Lorenzoa

aFrom the Department of Neurosurgery (A.S., P.G., R.T., N.D.L.), University of Florence, Florence, Italy
bDepartment of Radiology (B.G.), Wayne State University/Detroit Medical Center, Detroit, Mich
cDepartments of Neuroradiology (G.P.)
dGerontology (C.C.), University of Florence, Florence, Italy.

Please address correspondence to Antonio Scollato, MD, PhD, Clinica Neurochirurgica–Università di Firenze, CTO, Largo P. Palagi, 1, 50139 Florence, Italy; e-mail: a.scollato{at}neurochirurgiafirenze.it

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Aqueductal CSF stroke volume (ACSV) measured by phase-contrast MR imaging is a tool for selection of surgical patients with idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH). The aim of the present study was to investigate whether there is a relationship between clinical outcome and changes in ACSV in patients with iNPH who have been shunted.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-five shunted patients with iNPH underwent clinical evaluation and ACSV measurements 7–30 days before and 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery.

RESULTS: Two patients were excluded from the study for the occurrence of a perioperative complication. In a group of 35 clinically improved patients, the mean preoperative ACSV (157.01 µL) decreased to 18% one month after ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS) and ≤49% at 12 months post-VPS. In a group of 15 unimproved patients, the lower mean preoperative ACSV (84.2 µL) decreased to 14.3% one month post-VPS and ≤34% at 12 months post-VPS. In the other 8 improved patients who developed a subdural fluid collection (SDFC), ACSV values decreased by 43%–75% in the 3 months post-VPS. A postoperative ACSV increase was noted in 6 patients with a shunt system malfunction. One patient experienced both SDCF and shunt malfunction.

CONCLUSIONS: ACSV decreases in all patients in whom the VPS system works properly, with the rate of ACSV decrease being higher in the patients who show clinical improvement. Postoperative ACSV increase suggests shunt malfunction. A precipitous drop of ACSV values after VPS may be the consequence of increased drainage and herald the occurrence of SDFC.