AJDRAJNR - American Journal of Neuroradiology

This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Turski, P. A.
Right arrow Articles by Sackett, J. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Turski, P. A.
Right arrow Articles by Sackett, J. F.

American Journal of Neuroradiology, Vol 4, Issue 3 271-273, Copyright © 1983 by American Society of Neuroradiology


ARTICLES

Limitations of intravenous digital subtraction angiography

PA Turski, WJ Zwiebel, CM Strother, AB Crummy, GG Celesia and JF Sackett

Eighteen digital subtraction angiography (DSA) examinations were retrospectively evaluated for factors that led to their erroneous interpretation. Overlapping vessels obscured pathologic conditions in five cases. In four cases the lesions were not adequately profiled by the DSA projections. Eight lesions were rendered inconspicuous by misregistration artifacts attributable to motion, either from swallowing or from pulsation of vessel walls. One diagnostic error was caused by poor opacification from a degraded contrast bolus secondary to low cardiac output.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
PERSPECT VASC SURG ENDOVASC THERHome page
W. M. Kelly
Current Role of Digital Subtraction Angiography
Perspectives in Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, January 1, 1989; 2(1): 105 - 119.
[PDF]