AJDRAJNR - American Journal of Neuroradiology

This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Peterman, S. B.
Right arrow Articles by Bydder, G. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Peterman, S. B.
Right arrow Articles by Bydder, G. M.

American Journal of Neuroradiology, Vol 5, Issue 6 703-709, Copyright © 1984 by American Society of Neuroradiology


ARTICLES

Magnetic resonance imaging of intracranial tumors in children and adolescents

SB Peterman, RE Steiner and GM Bydder

Magnetic resonance (MR) scans were reviewed of 25 children and adolescents from the age of 9 months to 18 years referred with a suspected or proven diagnosis of intracranial tumor. Twenty-one of these children had MR scans positive for tumor. Histology was available in 14. The other seven patients were managed clinically as cases of cerebral tumor, although histologic confirmation was lacking. Seventeen tumors displayed an increase in both T1 and T2. One dermoid tumor and part of another displayed a very short T1 (less than that of white matter). Two hamartomas had T1s similar to that of gray matter and a small increase in T2. Four of the children did not show MR or computed tomographic (CT) evidence of intracranial tumors. Follow-up of these cases for 1-23 months after the MR and CT studies revealed no subsequent clinical evidence of tumor. MR scans showed more extensive abnormality than did third-generation CT scans in eight of 10 cases and more extensive abnormality than EMI CT 1010 scans in 10 of 11 cases. Mass effects were better demonstrated in 14 of the 16 patients in whom they were seen. CT demonstrated calcification better than did MR in all four cases in which it was identified. The tumor-edema interface was shown better on CT in each of the three cases with contrast enhancement on CT. MR is a sensitive method of evaluating intracranial tumors in children and adolescents.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
J. L. Freeman, L. T. Coleman, R. M. Wellard, M. J. Kean, J. V. Rosenfeld, G. D. Jackson, S. F. Berkovic, and A. S. Harvey
MR Imaging and Spectroscopic Study of Epileptogenic Hypothalamic Hamartomas: Analysis of 72 Cases
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., March 1, 2004; 25(3): 450 - 462.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
W. S. Ball Jr
PEDIATRIC NEURORADIOLOGY
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., January 1, 2000; 21(1): 29 - 36.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Child NeurolHome page
B. L. Maria, K. Rehder, T. A. Eskin, L. M. Hamed, E. B. Fennell, R. G. Quisling, J. P. Mickle, R. B. Marcus Jr, W. E. Drane, N. P. Mendenhall, et al.
Topical Review Article: Brainstem Glioma: I. Pathology, Clinical Features, and Therapy
J Child Neurol, April 1, 1993; 8(2): 112 - 128.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Child NeurolHome page
E. S. Roach, T. Smith, C. V. Terry, A. R. Riela, and D. W. Laster
Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Pediatric Neurologic Disorders
J Child Neurol, April 1, 1987; 2(2): 111 - 116.
[Abstract] [PDF]