AJDRAJNR - American Journal of Neuroradiology

This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sullivan, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Harms, S. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sullivan, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Harms, S. E.

American Journal of Neuroradiology, Vol 7, Issue 1 29-34, Copyright © 1986 by American Society of Neuroradiology


ARTICLES

Surface-coil MR imaging of orbital neoplasms

JA Sullivan and SE Harms

Fifteen patients with orbital neoplasms demonstrated by CT were studied with magnetic resonance (MR) using a 13 cm surface coil and a 0.6 T superconducting magnet. The use of a surface coil allowed for a reduction in slice thickness and a significant improvement in spatial resolution resulting in better demonstration and improved characterization of orbital lesions. All neoplasms (15/15) were demonstrated by MR. The lesions were grouped into four main categories on the basis of signal intensities on T1- and T2-weighted images. CT was superior to MR in displaying densely calcified or bony lesions (two of 15 cases). MR was at least equal or superior to CT in demonstrating the other lesions (13 of 15 cases) and had the added advantage of improved tissue characterization in some cases. With the use of surface coils, MR could become the primary imaging technique for evaluation of orbital neoplasms.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arch OphthalmolHome page
P. De Potter, A. E. Flanders, J. A. Shields, C. L. Shields, C. F. Gonzales, and V. M. Rao
The Role of Fat-Suppression Technique and Gadopentetate Dimeglumine in Magnetic Resonance Imaging Evaluation of Intraocular Tumors and Simulating Lesions
Arch Ophthalmol, March 1, 1994; 112(3): 340 - 348.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Arch OphthalmolHome page
P. A. Bloom, J. D. Ferris, D. A. H. Laidlaw, and P. R. Goddard
Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Diverse Appearances of Uveal Malignant Melanomas
Arch Ophthalmol, August 1, 1992; 110(8): 1105 - 1111.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Arch OphthalmolHome page
D. J. Bergin and V. Parmley
Orbital Neurilemoma
Arch Ophthalmol, March 1, 1988; 106(3): 414 - 415.
[PDF]


Home page
Arch OphthalmolHome page
N. H. Kolodny, E. S. Gragoudas, D. J. D'Amico, S. J. Kohler, J. M. Seddon, E. J. Murphy, C. Yun, and D. M. Albert
Proton and Sodium 23 Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Human Ocular Tissues: A Model Study
Arch Ophthalmol, November 1, 1987; 105(11): 1532 - 1536.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Arch OphthalmolHome page
R. B. Chambers, F. H. Davidorf, J. F. McAdoo, and D. W. Chakeres
Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Uveal Melanomas
Arch Ophthalmol, July 1, 1987; 105(7): 917 - 921.
[Abstract] [PDF]