AJDRAJNR - American Journal of Neuroradiology

This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hesselink, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Goodsitt, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hesselink, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Goodsitt, M.

American Journal of Neuroradiology, Vol 7, Issue 3 427-431, Copyright © 1986 by American Society of Neuroradiology


ARTICLES

Flow analysis with digital subtraction angiography: 2. Acquisition and accuracy of transit-flow measurements

JR Hesselink, KH Chang, KJ Chung, L Abbate and M Goodsitt

A steady-state flow model was used to optimize methods of data analysis, to investigate variables that affect the time-density curves, and to determine the accuracy of transit-flow measurements with digital subtraction angiography. The most accurate data were obtained by using a small region of interest placed within the vessel, averaged data acquisition, and a gamma-variate fit applied to the time-density curve. The integrated area of the curve depended on the flow, vessel size, amount of iodine injected, framing rate, and the kVp. The integrated area was not affected by the mAs; the matrix size; or the volume, concentration, or rate of injection of the contrast material. Subject density, image intensifier mode, and field size did not affect the curves except for their contribution to scatter and beam hardening. There was good correlation between digital subtraction angiographic transit-flow measurements and known flow values.