American Journal of Neuroradiology, Vol 8, Issue 1 19-26, Copyright © 1987 by American Society of Neuroradiology
ARTICLES |
Evaluation of traumatic atlantooccipital dislocations
C Lee, JH Woodring, SJ Goldstein, TL Daniel, AB Young and PA Tibbs
The diagnosis of traumatic atlantooccipital dislocation (AOD) from the cross-table lateral radiograph is difficult because of problems in demonstrating the complex anatomy of this area and the intricate radiographic methods used to diagnose AOD. Although CT or polytomography seem to be the most accurate diagnostic methods, it is often the lateral radiograph from which the diagnosis and further decisions are made. To determine both the best radiographic method for diagnosing AOD from the lateral radiograph and the role of CT and tomography in the diagnosis of AOD, the literature was reviewed concerning how the diagnosis of AOD has been obtained. In addition, the Wholey dens-basion line, the Powers ratio, the Dublin method of diagnosing AOD, and measurement of the atlantooccipital joint width were applied to 12 cases of traumatic AOD; and the Wholey dens-basion line and the Powers ratio were determined in 100 normal adults and 50 normal children. An alternative plain radiographic method for diagnosing AOD was developed, called the X-line method. This was the most accurate of the methods tested, correctly diagnosing AOD in 75% of cases. The Wholey dens-basion line and direct measurement of the atlantooccipital joint width were each correct in 50% of cases, the Powers ratio in 33% of cases, and the Dublin method in only 25% of cases. Ultimately, either CT or polytomography should provide the definitive diagnosis. In this regard high-resolution CT with reformatted coronal and sagittal images generated from 2-mm thin axial slices appeared to have the most promise as the first study of choice.
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  J. C. Bertozzi, C. A. Rojas, and C. R. Martinez Evaluation of the Pediatric Craniocervical Junction on MDCT Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2009; 192(1): 26 - 31. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
W. Chang, M. T. Alexander, and S. E. Mirvis Diagnostic Determinants of Craniocervical Distraction Injury in Adults Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2009; 192(1): 52 - 58. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C.A. Rojas, J.C. Bertozzi, C.R. Martinez, and J. Whitlow Reassessment of the Craniocervical Junction: Normal Values on CT AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., October 1, 2007; 28(9): 1819 - 1823. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 H. S. Hosalkar, E. L. Cain, D. Horn, K. R. Chin, J. P. Dormans, and D. S. Drummond Traumatic Atlanto-Occipital Dislocation in Children J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., November 1, 2005; 87(11): 2480 - 2488. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|