Intervertebral Disk Appearance Correlated withStiffness of Lumbar Spinal Motion Segments
Victor M. Haughton
,a,
Tae Hong Lima and
Howard Ana
a From the Departments of Radiology (V.M.H.), and Orthopedic Surgery (T.H.L., H.A.), Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI.

View larger version (36K):
[in a new window]
|
FIG 1. Artist's sketch of the biomechanical testing device to measure disk stiffness. The lower (L) and upper (U) vertebrae are attached to plates. The lower plate is fixed. By means of weights and pulleys, a torque is applied to the upper plate. The motion produced by the torque is calculated from the displacements of the reflective targets attached to the plate (see Methods).
| |

View larger version (256K):
[in a new window]
|
FIG 2. Sagittal MR images (2000/90[TR/TE]) of intervertebral disks classified as normal (A), transverse tear (B), radial tear (C), and advanced degeneration (D)
| |

View larger version (41K):
[in a new window]
|
FIG 3. Graph illustrating the relationship between stiffness and disk classification
| |

View larger version (32K):
[in a new window]
|
FIG 4. Graph illustrating the distribution of the individual stiffness measurements for the normal, transverse tear, radial tear, and advanced degeneration groups.
| |