AJDRAJNR - American Journal of Neuroradiology

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ishihara, M.
Right arrow Articles by Kumazaki, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ishihara, M.
Right arrow Articles by Kumazaki, T.

Loss of Interhemispheric Connectivity in Patients with Lacunar Infarction Reflected by Diffusion-Weighted MR Imaging and Single-Photon Emission CTGo

Makiko IshiharaGo,a, Shin-ichiro Kumitaa, Hiromitsu Hayashia and Tatsuo Kumazakia

a From the Department of Radiology, Nippon Medical School, 1–1–5 Sendagi, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8603, Japan.



View larger version (69K):

[in a new window]
 
FIG 1. A representative level of calculated ADC maps. ROIs, placed on the anterior and posterior corpus callosum and optic radiation, are 100 to 200 pixels each and the same in contour between the two maps.

A, ADC

B, ADC

C, A scheme for regional data extraction from these maps.



View larger version (85K):

[in a new window]
 
FIG 2. A–D, A representative series of binary SPECT scans showing masking levels of 60% (A), 65% (B), and 70% (C) of the maximal counts and the original SPECT scan (D). As the masking level increased, the number of masked pixels of relatively low counts also increased



View larger version (86K):

[in a new window]
 
FIG 3. An explanation of how the ACV, determined as the ratio of the number of pixels above the 80% masking level to the number above the 70% level, is validated. In this setting, the ACVs derived from the eight cortical areas should be homogeneous, because the actual tracer accumulation in the cortical area is uniform regardless of the regions.

A, Phantom MR image.

B, Phantom 123I-IMP SPECT scan.



View larger version (74K):

[in a new window]
 
FIG 4. A and B, A representation of regional data extraction from one of the original SPECT scans. ROIs are specified at the superior frontal lobe and the parietal lobe (A), and the inferior frontal lobe and the temporal lobe (B), so as not to include the primary sensorimotor area, mesial temporal lobe, or insula. The ROIs are superimposed on ACV maps



View larger version (21K):

[in a new window]
 
FIG 5. Correlations between the regional ACV and the MMSE scores. Individual ACVs in the superior and inferior frontal regions were well correlated with the MMSE score (superior frontal: r = .89, P < .05; inferior frontal, r = .71, P < .05).

Left upper, superior frontal.

Right upper, inferior frontal.

Left lower, parietal.

Right lower, temporal.



View larger version (27K):

[in a new window]
 
FIG 6. Correlations between the regional AR of the corpus callosum and the ACV of the frontal areas. The AR in the anterior corpus callosum is strongly correlated with the frontal ACVs (superior frontal: r = .86, P < .0001; inferior frontal: r = .79, P < .0005). However, there are insignificant trends toward correlation between the AR in the anterior corpus callosum and the frontal ACVs within the patient group.

Left upper, anterior corpus callosum versus superior frontal region.

Right upper, anterior corpus callosum versus inferior frontal region.

Left lower, posterior corpus callosum versus superior frontal region.

Right lower, posterior corpus callosum versus inferior frontal region.