AJDRAJNR - American Journal of Neuroradiology

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Marquart, M.
Right arrow Articles by Haughton, V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Marquart, M.
Right arrow Articles by Haughton, V.

Single- and Multiple-Event Paradigms for Identification of Motor Cortex Activation

Michael Marquarta, Rasmus Birna and Victor HaughtonGo,a

a From the Departments of Radiology (M.M., V.M.H.) and Biophysics Research Institute (R.M.B.), Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI.



View larger version (281K):

[in a new window]
 
FIG 1. Comparison of the block-design method and the single-event method for one participant.

A, Analyzed by the block-design method, the finger task shows activation in the sensorimotor cortex and (in an adjacent section that is not illustrated) in the midline in the presumed SMA.

B, Analyzed by the single-event method, the finger task shows activation in the sensorimotor cortex, SMA, and parietal and frontal lobes, which was classified as nonspecific in this study.

C, Analyzed by the block-design method, the tongue task shows activation in the inferior sensorimotor cortex on the convexity and in the SMA in the midline. Activation along the inner table over the left parietal lobe is likely motion artifact.

D, Analyzed by the single-event method, the tongue task produces activation in the SMA and sensorimotor cortex and in frontal and parietal regions. The motion artifact is less evident.



View larger version (47K):

[in a new window]
 
FIG 2. Average number of activated pixels within the sensorimotor cortex and SMA and outside these regions for each task and each analysis method



View larger version (50K):

[in a new window]
 
FIG 3. Percentage of activated pixels in the sensorimotor cortex region, in the SMA, and outside of these two areas