AJDRAJNR - American Journal of Neuroradiology

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Scanderbeg, A. C.
Right arrow Articles by Caltagirone, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Scanderbeg, A. C.
Right arrow Articles by Caltagirone, C.

Demyelinating Plaques in Relapsing-remitting and Secondary-progressive Multiple Sclerosis: Assessment with Diffusion MR Imaging

Alessandro Castriota Scanderbega, Francesco Tomaiuoloa, Umberto Sabatinia, Ugo Nocentinia, Maria G. Grassoa and Carlo Caltagironea

a From the Departments of Radiology (A.C-S., F.T., U.S.) and Neurology (M.G.G.), I.R.C.C.S., S. Lucia, Rome, Italy; and from the Department of Neurology (U.N., C.C.), University Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.



View larger version (140K):

[in a new window]
 
FIG 1. A–D, Axial SE T1-weighted (A), fast SE T2-weighted (B), and echo-planar T2-weighted (C) MR images, and the orientationally averaged ADC map (D), show the presence of multiple periventricular demyelinating lesions in a patient with secondary-progressive MS. Circle indicates the ROI



View larger version (11K):

[in a new window]
 
FIG 2. Scatter plot of the coefficient <D> data points for the relapsing-remitting (RR, 10 points), secondary-progressive (SP, 10 points), and control group (NWM, normal white matter, 11 points). Each point corresponds to one subject and represents the mean value of <D> as obtained in each subject from all the ROIs that were drawn on the T2-weighted (b = 0) images. Graph shows there is no overlap between the relapsing-remitting and secondary-progressive groups



View larger version (14K):

[in a new window]
 
FIG 3. Scatter plot of the coefficient <D> vs. EDSS score shows a significant correlation. Each point corresponds to one patient and represents the mean value of <D> as obtained from all the ROIs that were drawn on the T2-weighted (b = 0) images. Closed circles represent the subjects with relapsing-remitting MS; open circles, the subjects with secondary-progressive MS



View larger version (16K):

[in a new window]
 
FIG 4. Scatter plot of coefficient <D> vs. disease duration shows a significant correlation. Each point corresponds to one patient and represents the mean value of <D> as obtained from all the ROIs that were drawn on the T2-weighted (b = 0) images. Closed circles represent the patients with relapsing-remitting MS; open circles, the patients with secondary-progressive MS



View larger version (9K):

[in a new window]
 
FIG 5. Scatter plot of coefficient <D> vs. SIlesion/SICSF ratio on SE T1-weighted images for the 41 T1 hypointense lesions studied. There is a significant inverse correlation between <D> and SIlesion/SICSF ratio. Each point corresponds to one lesion. Closed circles represent lesions from the relapsing-remitting group (11 lesions); open circles, lesions from the secondary-progressive group (30 lesions)