AJDRAJNR - American Journal of Neuroradiology

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Roberts, H. C.
Right arrow Articles by Dillon, W. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Roberts, H. C.
Right arrow Articles by Dillon, W. P.

Quantitative Measurement of Microvascular Permeability in Human Brain Tumors Achieved Using Dynamic Contrast-enhanced MR Imaging: Correlation with Histologic Grade

Heidi C. RobertsGo,a, Timothy P. L. Robertsa, Robert C. Brascha and William P. Dillona

a From the Department of Radiology, Box 0628, University of California, 513 Parnassus Ave, San Francisco, CA 94143.



View larger version (31K):

[in a new window]
 
FIG 1. A, Schematic representation of two capillaries containing contrast agent. The healthy capillary with an intact BBB (left) is not permeable to the contrast agent, which remains intravascular. A diseased capillary with a disrupted BBB may become permeable to the agent, leading to accumulation of contrast agent outside the vessel (right).

B, Because the contrast agent causes relaxation rate enhancement to water in its environment, initial tissue relaxation rate enhancement reflects the fraction of the tissue containing blood vessels (since the contrast agent is, at least initially, confined to the intravascular compartment). The ratio of initial enhancement in tissue to enhancement in a region of 100% blood (eg, the sagittal sinus) will then yield the fBV. Over time, if the contrast agent leaks out of the vessel into the extravascular space of the tissue, the relaxation rate will rise progressively. The rate of increase in relaxation rate is proportional to the permeability of the capillary wall to the contrast agent.



View larger version (155K):

[in a new window]
 
FIG 2. A, MR image before contrast administration (top left) and six dynamic contrast-enhanced MR images of a grade 2 oligoastrocytoma. Top center, 15 seconds; top right, 45 seconds; middle left, 75 seconds; middle center, 105 seconds; middle right, 135 seconds; and lower left, 165 seconds after contrast administration. From these seven images, spatial maps of fBV and kPS were determined: fBV (lower center) was estimated as 12.8% in the ventral, enhancing part of the tumor and as 9.3% in the more dorsal part. kPS values (lower right) were 0.31 mL/100 cm3 per minute in the tumor (compared with 0.02 mL/100 cm3 per minute in normal brain tissue)



View larger version (138K):

[in a new window]
 
FIG 2. B, MR image before contrast administration (top left) and six dynamic contrast-enhanced MR images of a grade 4 glioblastoma multiforme. Top center, 15 seconds; top right, 45 seconds; middle left, 75 seconds; middle center, 105 seconds; middle right, 135 seconds; and lower left, 165 seconds after contrast administration. From these seven images, spatial maps of fBV and kPS were determined: fBV (lower center) was estimated as 3.0% in the tumor rim and as 0.01% in the core. kPS values (lower right) were 13.6 mL/100 cm3 per minute in the tumor (compared with 0.5 mL/100 cm3 per minute in the core). Times are defined as the time after contrast that the center of k-space (mid-part of 3D acquisition) was attained.



View larger version (36K):

[in a new window]
 
FIG 3. A–D, Fitted curves of the {Delta}SI time course of a typical low-grade (A, B) and a typical high-grade (C, D) tumor. Dynamic postcontrast values for the reference vascular signal (sagittal sinus) are displayed in A and C, respectively, and for tumor curves in B and D, respectively. The equations are displayed on the graphs. The low-grade tumor (patient 8 in Table 1) has an fBV of 3.2%, k1 + k2 is 5.8, and kPS is 5.5; the high-grade tumor (patient 20 in Table 1) has an fBV of 6.7%, k1 + k2 is 13.7, and kPS is 10.8. Times are defined as the time after contrast administration that the center of k-space (mid-part of 3D acquisition) was attained.



View larger version (9K):

[in a new window]
 
FIG 4. A–C, Correlation between fBV (A), kPS (B), and total permeability, k, (C) and histologically determined tumor grade. While the data points in A are very scattered, reflective of a weak correlation (r = .39) between fBV and tumor grade, the slope is nonetheless positive, suggesting a tendency toward increased fBV in higher-grade tumors. For kPS, the tendency is more pronounced, with reduced scatter (r = .76). In comparison, total permeability, k, yielded a similar correlation (r = .83), with a steeper slope and less overlap between tumor grade groups.