AJDRAJNR - American Journal of Neuroradiology

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sharma, A.
Right arrow Articles by Kale, S. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sharma, A.
Right arrow Articles by Kale, S. S.

Partial Aplasia of the Posterior Arch of the Atlas with an Isolated Posterior Arch Remnant: Findings in Three Cases

Aseem Sharmaa, Shailesh B. GaikwadGo,a, Parminder S. Deola, Nalin K. Mishraa and Shashank S. Kalea

a From the Departments of Neuroradiology (A.S., S.B.G., P.S.D., N.K.M.) and Neurosurgery (S.S.K.), Neurosciences Centre, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.



View larger version (125K):

[in a new window]
 
FIG 1. 32-year-old woman with intermittent weakness and numbness of all four limbs.

A and B, Lateral radiographs of cervical spine taken in flexion (A) and extension (B) reveal partial aplasia of the posterior arch of the atlas with an isolated posterior bony fragment. Note the anterior displacement of the bony fragment during extension (B).

C, Midsagittal T1-weighted MR image through the cervical spine shows no compression of the cord by the posterior bony fragment (arrow).

D, Corresponding T2-weighted image shows a small, localized region of hyperintensity within the cord (arrow). Note that the signal alteration is seen slightly inferior to the anteroinferior margin of the isolated posterior arch remnant. A superimposed canal stenosis was noted from C2 through C5.



View larger version (117K):

[in a new window]
 
FIG 2. 35-year-old woman with neck pain and paresthesias in both upper limbs.

A and B, In varying degrees of extension, plain radiographs show partial aplasia of the posterior arch of the atlas, with an isolated posterior tubercle. No obvious anterior displacement of the posterior tubercle is observed during extension.

C, Midsagittal T1-weighted MR image reveals no cord compression.

D, Corresponding T2-weighted image shows small, focal intramedullary hyperintensity (arrow) located just below the level of the posterior tubercle. In addition, there is focal canal stenosis at the C2–C3 disk level.



View larger version (116K):

[in a new window]
 
FIG 3. 30-year-old man with neck pain and occasional upper limb paresthesias.

A and B, Flexion (A) and extension (B) plain radiographs of the cervical spine show partial aplasia of the posterior arch of the atlas with an isolated posterior arch remnant. The isolated posterior fragment moves anteriorly into the spinal canal during extension (B).

C and D, Midsagittal T1-weighted (C) and T2-weighted (D) MR images reveal no compression or signal alteration of the spinal cord. Significant canal stenosis from C3 to C7 is present along with a superimposed disk bulge/protrusion at C5–C6.