AJDRAJNR - American Journal of Neuroradiology

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Boecher-Schwarz, H. G.
Right arrow Articles by Kempski, O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Boecher-Schwarz, H. G.
Right arrow Articles by Kempski, O.

Ex Vivo Study of the Physical Effect of Coils on Pressure and Flow Dynamics in Experimental Aneurysms

Hans G. Boecher-SchwarzGo,a, Kurt Ringela, Laszlo Kopacza, Axel Heimanna and Oliver Kempskia

a From the Departments of Neurosurgery (H.G.B.-S.) and Neuroradiology (K.R.), University Hospital, and the Institut of Neurosurgical Pathophysiology (L.K., A.H., O.K.), University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany.



View larger version (12K):

[in a new window]
 
FIG 1. Schematic drawing of the experimental system. Systemic flow was obtained from a conventional peristaltic pump, and then four air chambers and one check valve were used to produce a nearly constant, laminar, and unidirectional flow. This flow was then superimposed with a pulsatile flow generated by an electronically controlled valve and a resistance system. Intraaneurysmal and systemic pressure were recorded online



View larger version (13K):

[in a new window]
 
FIG 2. Intraaneurysmal and systemic pressure measurements (± standard error of mean) obtained before and after coiling. The amount and shape of the pressure waves were not significantly different before and after coil embolization. (x axis, each time interval = 10–1 s)

A, Circulating fluid, 0.9% saline.

B, Circulating fluid, heparinized blood.



View larger version (8K):

[in a new window]
 
FIG 3. Aneurysmal pulsation measurements (± standard error of mean) obtained before and after coil embolization. (x axis, each time interval = 10–1 s)

A, After coiling and while circulating a 0.9% saline solution, a statistically significant (P = .022) reduction of wall displacement was observed

B, No statistically significant reduction was observed with blood.



View larger version (8K):

[in a new window]
 
FIG 4. Wall displacement/pressure curves measured before and after coil embolization describe hysteresis loops. Wall displacement follows changes in pressure with delay (arrows).

A, Circulating fluid, 0.9% saline.

B, Circulating fluid, heparinized blood.



View larger version (10K):

[in a new window]
 
FIG 5. Results of impact/force measurements obtained for all experiments after coiling and while circulating a 0.9% saline solution. After embolization, in two cases, an increase of impact of more than twice the original values was measured. (x axis, each time interval = 10–1 s; y axis, impact/force [F]; diastolic value of impact = 0%; sytolic peak value of impact before coiling = 100%)