AJDRAJNR - American Journal of Neuroradiology

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kado, H.
Right arrow Articles by Itoh, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kado, H.
Right arrow Articles by Itoh, H.

Abnormal Magnetization Transfer Ratios in Normal-appearing White Matter on Conventional MR Images of Patients with Occlusive Cerebrovascular Disease

Hirotsugu KadoGo,a, Hirohiko Kimuraa, Tatsuro Tsuchidaa, Yoshiharu Yonekuraa, Tomoo Tokimea, Yasuhiko Tokurikia and Harumi Itoha

a From the Department of Radiology (H.Ka., H.ki., T.Tsu., H.I.) and Biomedical Imaging Research Center (Y.Yo.), Fukui Medical University, Fukui; and Department of Neurosurgery (T.To., Y.To.), Fukui Red Cross Hospital, Fukui, Japan



View larger version (119K):

[in a new window]
 
FIG 1. The location of selected ROIs. Four ROIs were selected in the lesional deep white matter and three in the lesional centrum semiovale. Although this figure shows that ROIs were placed only on MTR maps and CBF images, actually the same ROIs were selected on T2-weighted images and other PET scans (CMRO2 and OEF images). PET scans were registered to the MR images of each subject. Circular ROIs were placed in right and left symmetrical locations, so that the AI could be calculated



View larger version (17K):

[in a new window]
 
FIG 2. 2D plot of MTR and rCMRO2 values with an AI from groups 0, 1, and 2. The correlation coefficient was .85 (P = .001)