AJDRAJNR - American Journal of Neuroradiology

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Honkaniemi, J.
Right arrow Articles by Haapasalo, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Honkaniemi, J.
Right arrow Articles by Haapasalo, H.

Delayed MR Imaging Changes in Acute Disseminated Encephalomyelitis

Jari Honkaniemia, Prasun Dastidara, Veikko Kähäräa and Hannu Haapasaloa

a From the Departments of Neurology and Rehabilitation (J.H.), Diagnostic Radiology (P.D., V.K.), and Neuropathology (H.H.), Tampere University Hospital and Medical School, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland.



View larger version (65K):

[in a new window]
 
FIG 1. Hematoxylin-eosin (A) and luxol fast blue (B) staining of the lesion seen in the cerebellum of case 2. Hematoxylin-eosin staining shows intact gray matter and some degenerative changes of the white matter. Luxol fast blue staining of myelin (blue) shows a restricted, focal area of demyelination (arrows)



View larger version (101K):

[in a new window]
 
FIG 2. PD (3000/40/1 [TR/TE/TI]) (first image) and non-contrast FLAIR (9002/200/2200/2 [TR/TE/TI/excitations]) MR images of case 1 at indicated times after admission to the hospital. The first scan, performed at 2 days, does not reveal any intraparenchymal lesions. In the second scan done 1 week after admission, when the patient was unconscious and connected to a respirator, only two weakly high-signal areas are located in the basal ganglia, which by 3 weeks have grown (arrows). Despite significant recovery, several new lesions are seen in the periventricular white matter 1 month after admission (arrows). By 2 months, almost all the lesions are resolved



View larger version (155K):

[in a new window]
 
FIG 3. Non-contrast FLAIR (9002/200/2200/2) MR images of case 2 at 3 and 6 weeks after admission. MR imaging performed at 3 weeks does not show any focal lesions, whereas the last MR scan shows a few high-density lesions located in the deep periventricular white matter (arrows) in addition to a subcortical infarct in the left frontoparietal lobe (arrowhead). A large, high-density lesion is located in the right cerebellar hemisphere



View larger version (72K):

[in a new window]
 
FIG 4. T2-weighted (4000/115/1 [TR/TE/excitation]) MR images of case 3. The first MR scan taken 2 days after admission shows a large lesion in the right centrum semiovale (arrows), as well as in the periventricular white matter and basal ganglia (arrowheads). By 2 weeks, these lesions have grown despite steroid treatment and slight improvement in the patient's condition. By 1 month, some petecchial hemorrhage is seen in the lesions (arrows). On the last MR scan, performed 4 months after admission to the hospital, the lesions are somewhat decreased in size. Note the mild cortical pseudoatrophy likely caused by the steroid treatment



View larger version (129K):

[in a new window]
 
FIG 5. Non-contrast FLAIR (9002/200/2200/2) images of case 4. The first MR scan shows a few focal ischemic white matter lesions located in the right frontal and left occipital lobes. The second scan, performed 2 months after admission, reveals several new lesions located in the deep periventricular white matter. These lesions do not show any major resolution in the follow-up scans performed at 4 and 8 months