AJDRAJNR - American Journal of Neuroradiology

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Arfanakis, K.
Right arrow Articles by Meyerand, M. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Arfanakis, K.
Right arrow Articles by Meyerand, M. E.

Diffusion Tensor MR Imaging in Diffuse Axonal Injury

Konstantinos Arfanakisa, Victor M. Haughtonb, John D. Carewc, Baxter P. Rogersa, Robert J. Dempseyd and M. Elizabeth Meyeranda

a Department of Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin, Madison
b Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin, Madison
c Department of Statistics, University of Wisconsin, Madison
d Department of Neurosurgery, University of Wisconsin, Madison



View larger version (18K):

[in a new window]
 
FIG 1. Illustration of the changes that axons undergo owing to cytoskeletal perturbation from mild traumatic brain injury.

A, The top neuron is healthy. In the bottom neuron, neurofilamentous and, generally, cytoskeletal misalignment is visible a short time after injury. This impairs axonal transport.

B, Organelles accumulate in the injured region, causing the axon to swell locally and subsequently disconnect from the rest. In this Figure, the dimensions of the axons relative to the interaxonal space do not necessarily correspond to reality.



View larger version (77K):

[in a new window]
 
FIG 2. Example of the selection of voxels from the five structures under study, in one section of a control subject. The background image is an LI map. The red dots correspond to the selected voxels. The dots were made larger than the in-plane dimensions of a single voxel for visualization purposes.



View larger version (39K):

[in a new window]
 
FIG 3. A, LI map in a control subject. The border between the anterior (AIC) and posterior (PIC) limbs of the internal capsule is not obvious from this image.

B, Absolute value color map of the same section as in A. Arrows indicate the exact level of the border between AIC and PIC. Color representation of directions in 3D space helps to clearly separate the two structures.

C, Color circle demonstrates the correspondence of colors and directions in 3D space. This circle should be thought of as a 3D dome that is viewed from below.



View larger version (63K):

[in a new window]
 
FIG 4. A, T2-weighted image in a patient with mild traumatic brain injury. Small hemorrhagic lesions are visible in the left occipital lobe and right frontal lobe.

B, Diffusion-weighted map of the same section in the same patient, for one of the 23 diffusion-weighted gradient directions. The abnormal regions from A are also visible in B.

C, Corresponding trace map. The same lesions from A and B can be detected.

D, LI map of the same section in the same patient. Decreased anisotropy is visible in the left internal capsule and left anterior corpus callosum. No abnormality was demonstrated in these regions with any other type of imaging. On this LI map, however, the hemorrhagic lesions from A, B, and C are hard to identify. R indicates right; L, left.



View larger version (32K):

[in a new window]
 
FIG 5. Graphs show distributions of FA results from 10 selected ROIs (5 structures x 2 hemispheres) for the control subjects (continuous lines) combined with the corresponding FA values for the five patients with mild traumatic brain injuries (vertical lines), in the left (A) and right (B) hemispheres. All horizontal axes represent FA values. P values are reported only for cases in which FA results for the patients were significantly different (P < .05) from the mean FA results of the control subjects. For the patients, anisotropy was found to be significantly reduced in several structures compared with normal values. Reduction of FA was more often in the internal capsule and corpus callosum and less often in the external capsule of the patients. LACC and RACC indicate left and right anterior corpus callosum, respectively; LPCC and RPCC, left and right posterior corpus callosum; LEC and REC, left and right external capsule; LAIC and RAIC, left and right anterior internal capsule; LPIC and RPIC, left and right posterior internal capsule.



View larger version (36K):

[in a new window]
 
FIG 6. Bar graphs of ratios of diffusion characteristics between the two sides of four structures in a patient with mild traumatic brain injury, using the immediate (A) and short-term follow-up (B) data. The quantities {lambda}1, {lambda}2, {lambda}3, trace, FA, and LI correspond to that side of the structure that has the lowest anisotropy on the immediate image. The quantities {lambda}1’, {lambda}2’, {lambda}3’, trace’, FA’, and LI’ correspond to the contralateral side of these structures. The four structures are external capsule (EC), anterior corpus callosum (ACC), posterior internal capsule (PIC), and anterior internal capsule (AIC). Each structure corresponds to a specific color. For the immediate data set, one side of the four structures has lower {lambda}1, higher {lambda}2 and {lambda}3, and lower FA and LI than its contralateral homologous side. Also, trace is similar for both sides. For the follow-up data set, {lambda}1, {lambda}2, {lambda}3, FA, and LI have become more similar between the two sides of each structure, therefore giving ratios that are closer to 1. The ratios of the trace have remained at values almost equal to 1. When looking at the absolute values of the diffusion characteristics, we notice that the ratios change because the side of each structure that had low anisotropy on the immediate dataset has higher anisotropy on the follow-up dataset.