AJDRAJNR - American Journal of Neuroradiology

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Albayram, S.
Right arrow Articles by Islak, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Albayram, S.
Right arrow Articles by Islak, C.

MR Imaging Findings of Spinal Dural Involvement with Wegener Granulomatosis

Sait Albayrama, Osman Kizilkiliea, Ibrahim Adaletlia, Nuray Erdogana, Naci Kocera and Civan Islaka

a From the Department of Radiology, The Cerrahpasa Medical School, Istanbul, Turkey



View larger version (204K):

[in a new window]
 
FIG 1. MR images show two dural soft-tissue masses (arrows) located at the cervical and thoracic (C1–C2 and T1–T4, respectively) levels. The dural soft tissue masses caused indentation to the spinal cord without prominent cord compression. They wrapped around the spinal cord, especially posteriorly at the cervical level and left posterolaterally at the thoracic level. These lesions are minimally hyperintense to spinal cord on T1-weighted MR images and prominently hypointense on T2-weighted images. Contrast-enhanced MR images reveal no prominent enhancement in these lesions except minimal peripheral enhancement. No abnormal signal intensity is present in the spinal cord on the T2-weighted images at the level of the lesions. At the lower cervical and upper thoracic levels, minimal anterior dural thickening with the same signal intensity features of dural masses on the C7–T1–T2 levels are also noted (arrow).

A, Sagittal T2-weighted (4550/137/2 [TR/TE/NEX]) MR image.

B, Axial T2-weighted (4360/100/2) MR image.

C, Sagittal T1-weighted (617/13/2) MR image.

D, Axial T1-weighted (516/13/2) MR image.

E, Sagittal contrast-enhanced T1-weighted (617/13/2) MR image obtained after the IV administration of contrast material.

F, Axial contrast-enhanced T1-weighted (516/13/2) MR image obtained after the IV administration of contrast material.



View larger version (169K):

[in a new window]
 
FIG 2. Follow-up MR images obtained 1 month later, after treatment.

A, Two sagittal T2-weighted (4550/137/2) MR images.

B, Four contrast-enhanced axial T1-weighted (4360/100/2) MR images reveal regression of posterior dural soft tissue masses (stars and arrows).