AJDRAJNR - American Journal of Neuroradiology

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mohamed, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Calhoun, V. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mohamed, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Calhoun, V. D.

Timing of Cortical Activation: A Latency-Resolved Event-Related Functional MR Imaging Study

Mona A. Mohameda, David M. Yousema, Aylin Tekesa, Nina M. Brownera and Vince D. Calhounb,c

a Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Division of Neuroradiology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD
b Division of Psychiatric Neuro-Imaging, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD
c Olin Neuropsychiatry Research Center, Institute of Living, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT



View larger version (57K):

[in a new window]
 
FIG 1. Statistical activation maps (top left), T1W sections (top right), and render images (bottom left) for the random-effects group analysis (n = 26) showing the visual and motor activations P < .05 (corrected).



View larger version (66K):

[in a new window]
 
FIG 2. A single subject’s averaged time course of the fMRI % signal intensity change in the visual cortex (RO) by using his amplitude estimate and the group map.



View larger version (100K):

[in a new window]
 
FIG 3. Mean lower quartile latencies (in seconds ± SEM) by using the group map for 26 subjects.



View larger version (71K):

[in a new window]
 
FIG 4. Mean lower quartile latencies (in seconds ± SEM) by using the individual maps for the 26 subjects.



View larger version (19K):

[in a new window]
 
FIG 5. Regression analysis between RT and age.



View larger version (19K):

[in a new window]
 
FIG 6. Regression analysis between age and the group analysis SMA latency.



View larger version (18K):

[in a new window]
 
FIG 7. Regression analysis between age and the individual analysis SMA latency.