AJDRAJNR - American Journal of Neuroradiology

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Law, M.
Right arrow Articles by Zagzag, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Law, M.
Right arrow Articles by Zagzag, D.

Glioma Grading: Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predictive Values of Perfusion MR Imaging and Proton MR Spectroscopic Imaging Compared with Conventional MR Imaging

Meng Lawa, Stanley Yanga, Hao Wangc, James S. Babba,c, Glyn Johnsona, Soonmee Chad, Edmond A. Knoppa,b and David Zagzagc

a Department of Radiology, New York University Medical Center, NY
b Department of Neurosurgery, New York University Medical Center, NY
c Department of Pathology, New York University Medical Center, NY
d Department of Biostatistics, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
e Department of Radiology, University of California at San Francisco Medical Center, San Francisco, CA



View larger version (83K):

[in a new window]
 
FIG 1. 20-year-old woman with biopsy-proved high-grade glioma.

A, Contrast-enhanced axial T1-weighted image (600/14/1 [TR/TE/NEX]) demonstrates an ill-defined nonenhancing mass (arrow) in the right frontal region. The lack of enhancement on the conventional MR image suggests a low-grade glioma.

B, Axial T2-weighted image (3400/119/1) shows increased signal intensity in the mass, with minimal peritumoral edema. This mass was graded as a low-grade glioma with conventional MR imaging because of lack of enhancement, minimal edema, no necrosis, and no mass effect.

C, Gradient-echo (1000/54) axial perfusion MR image with rCBV color overlay map shows increased perfusion with a high rCBV of 7.72, in keeping with a high-grade glioma.

D, Spectrum from proton MR spectroscopy with the PRESS sequence (1500/144) demonstrates markedly elevated Cho and decreased NAA with a Cho/NAA ratio of 2.60, as well as increased lactate (Lac), in keeping with a high-grade glioma.



View larger version (92K):

[in a new window]
 
FIG 2. 43-year-old man with biopsy-proved low-grade glioma.

A, Contrast-enhanced axial T1-weighted image (600/14/1) demonstrates a peripherally enhancing mass (arrow) in the right frontal region. The presence of contrast material enhancement on the conventional MR image would suggest a high-grade glioma.

B, Axial T2-weighted image (3400/119/1) shows marked peritumoral edema with possible necrosis and blood products. This mass was graded as a high-grade glioma with conventional MR imaging because of the contrast material enhancement, heterogeneity, blood products, possible necrosis, and degree of edema.

C, Gradient-echo (1000/54) axial perfusion MR image with rCBV color overlay map shows a low rCBV of 1.70, in keeping with a low-grade glioma.

D, Spectrum from proton MR spectroscopy with the PRESS sequence (1500/144) demonstrates elevated Cho and slightly decreased NAA with a Cho/NAA ratio of 0.90, which is more in keeping with a low-grade glioma.



View larger version (19K):

[in a new window]
 
FIG 3. ROC curves for rCBV plus metabolites, rCBV alone, Cho/Cr, and Cho/NAA demonstrate superior sensitivity and specificity of rCBV plus metabolites and rCBV alone compared with conventional MR imaging (cMRI, green asterisk) for glioma grading.