AJDRAJNR - American Journal of Neuroradiology

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Alvarez-Linera, J.
Right arrow Articles by Gesto, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Alvarez-Linera, J.
Right arrow Articles by Gesto, R.

Prospective Evaluation of Carotid Artery Stenosis: Elliptic Centric Contrast-Enhanced MR Angiography and Spiral CT Angiography Compared with Digital Subtraction Angiography

Juan Alvarez-Lineraa, Julián Benito-Leónb, José Escribanoa, Jorge Campolloc and Ricardo Gestod

a Department of Neuroradiology, Rúber International Hospital, Madrid, Spain
b Service of Neurology, Móstoles General Hospital, Móstoles, Spain
c Department of Neuroradiology, University Hospital "Doce de Octubre," Madrid, Spain
d Service of Vascular Surgery, University Hospital "Doce de Octubre," Madrid, Spain



View larger version (124K):

[in a new window]
 
FIG 1. Grade 1 stenosis of the left internal carotid artery.

A, Oblique DSA image shows minimal stenosis of the left internal carotid artery.

B, Elliptic centric contrast-enhanced MR angiogram, in the same projection as that of the DSA image, depicts a good correlation with DSA.

C, Spiral CT angiogram shows that the calcium distribution (type 1) does not preclude a good evaluation of the vessel.



View larger version (131K):

[in a new window]
 
FIG 2. Grade 2 stenosis overestimated with elliptic centric contrast-enhanced MR angiography.

A, Oblique DSA image demonstrates a grade 2 stenosis in the left internal carotid artery.

B, Elliptic centric contrast-enhanced MR angiogram shows mild overestimation of the stenosis (grade 3).

C, Spiral CT angiogram shows good correlation with DSA.



View larger version (124K):

[in a new window]
 
FIG 3. Grade 4 stenosis with good correlation in all techniques.

A, Oblique DSA image shows critical stenosis in the right internal carotid artery.

B, Elliptic centric contrast-enhanced MR angiogram depicts the same information.

C, Spiral CT angiogram shows a good correlation with the other imaging techniques. Notice a type 3 calcification in the wall of artery; however, it is sufficiently separated in the reconstruction image.



View larger version (82K):

[in a new window]
 
FIG 4. Grade 2 stenosis overestimated with spiral CT angiography.

A, Oblique DSA image shows grade 2 stenosis in the left internal carotid artery.

B, Elliptic centric contrast-enhanced MR angiogram shows the same findings.

C and D, Spiral CT angiograms show type 4 calcification. In this case, the stenosis was overestimated (grade 3) because of the difficulty in separating calcium from the contrast material.